Modified natural cycle IVF versus conventional stimulation in advanced-age Bologna poor responders

Files

1-s2.0-S1472648319305474-main.pdf (477.02 KB)

Date

2019

Type:

Article

Collections

Artículos Medicina y Ciencias de la Salud

Descargas totales

216

Vistas totales

0
Gestores bibliográficos

Authors

item.contributor.advisor

ORCID:

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

item.page.isbn

item.page.issn

item.page.issne

item.page.doiurl

URI

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rbmo.2019.05.009
 http://hdl.handle.net/11447/6362

item.page.extent

item.page.accessRights

item.page.other

item.page.references

Abstract

Research question: Do ongoing pregnancy rates (OPR) differ between modified natural cycle IVF (MNC-IVF) and conventional high-dose ovarian stimulation (HDOS) in advanced-age Bologna poor responders? ...

Description

item.page.coverage.spatial

item.page.sponsorship

Citation

Drakopoulos P, Romito A, Errázuriz J, Santos-Ribeiro S, Popovic-Todorovic B, Racca A, Tournaye H, De Vos M, Blockeel C. Modified natural cycle IVF versus conventional stimulation in advanced-age Bologna poor responders. Reprod Biomed Online. 2019 Oct;39(4):698-703. doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2019.05.009.

Keywords

Bologna criteria , IVF , Modified natural cycle , Oocytes , Poor responders

item.page.dc.rights

item.page.dc.rights.url

Estadísticas de uso
1 0,8 0,5 0,3 0
Septiembre 2025Octubre 2025Noviembre 2025Diciembre 2025Enero 2026Febrero 2026Marzo 2026

Implementado por OpenGeek Services