Effects of experience with access regimes on stewardship behaviors of small-scale fishers
Date
2021
Type:
Article
item.page.extent
item.page.accessRights
item.contributor.advisor
ORCID:
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
item.page.isbn
item.page.issn
item.page.issne
item.page.doiurl
item.page.other
item.page.references
Abstract
Governance regimes that assign exclusive access to support collective action are increas-
ingly promoted to manage common-pool resources under the premise that they foster
environmental stewardship. However, experimental evidence linked to existing policies that support this premise is lacking. Overlapping access policies in small-scale fisheries provide a unique opportunity to test the effects of access regimes on users’ stewardship behaviors.
We performed a lab-in-the-field experiment to assess how fishers’ previous experience with access regimes relates to compliance and peer enforcement (n = 120). Fishers’ compliance and peer-enforcement decisions were compared in a common-pool-resource game. Treatments differed in framing to represent exclusive access and pseudo-open access regimes, both of which fishers face in real life. To contrast behavior in the game with real-life observations, we compared fishers’ associations that have shown relatively high and low management performance under exclusive access policies. Compliance and peer enforcement were higher under the exclusive access treatment than under the pseudo-open access treatment only for fishers’ associations with high management performance in real life. Behaviors in the game reflected differences between associations in real life. Our results support previous research on ocean governance by experimentally assessing the role of access regimes in determining users’ stewardship and suggest potential mechanisms for stewardship internalization.
Description
item.page.coverage.spatial
item.page.sponsorship
Citation
Rivera-Hechem MI., et al. Effects of experience with access regimes on stewardship behaviors of small-scale fishers. Conservation Biology. 2021;1−10.
Keywords
Collective action, Environmental stewardship, External validity, Lab-in-the-field experiment, Small-scale fisheries, Territorial user rights for fisheries