Machery’s Alternative to Concepts and the Problem of Content
| dc.contributor.author | Pino, Bernardo | |
| dc.contributor.author | Aguilera, Bernardo | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2017-09-05T18:39:31Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2017-09-05T18:39:31Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2017 | |
| dc.description.abstract | Edouard Machery has argued that the notion of concept should be eliminated from scientific theorising about cognition on the grounds that what psychologists call concepts do not form a natural kind and that keeping this notion would encumber scientific progress. His view is that the class of concepts really divides into three distinct yet co-referential kinds of bodies of knowledge typically used in distinct cognitive processes. The main purpose of this paper is to challenge Machery’s eliminativist conclusion on the grounds that his alternative to concepts fails to be combined with any prominent account of content determination. As a case of philosophical scrutiny of a psychological proposal, the paper also intends to show how philosophical and psychological interests in concepts can be brought together. | |
| dc.format.extent | 21 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | Erkenntnis, June 2017, pp 1–21 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/11447/1651 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10670-017-9908-0 | |
| dc.language.iso | en_US | |
| dc.publisher | Springer | |
| dc.subject | concepts | |
| dc.subject | content | |
| dc.subject | meaning | |
| dc.subject | mental representations | |
| dc.subject | eliminativism | |
| dc.subject | heterogeneity hypothesis | |
| dc.subject | psychological explanation | |
| dc.subject | categorization | |
| dc.title | Machery’s Alternative to Concepts and the Problem of Content | |
| dc.type | Artículo |
Files
Original bundle
1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
- Name:
- Pino&Aguilera_Erkenntnis PP.pdf
- Size:
- 278.37 KB
- Format:
- Adobe Portable Document Format
- Description:
- Texto completo