Machery’s Alternative to Concepts and the Problem of Content
Date
2017
Type:
Artículo
item.page.extent
21
item.page.accessRights
Authors
item.contributor.advisor
ORCID:
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Springer
item.page.isbn
item.page.issn
item.page.issne
item.page.doiurl
item.page.other
item.page.references
Abstract
Edouard Machery has argued that the notion of concept should be eliminated from scientific theorising about cognition on the grounds that what psychologists call concepts do not form a natural kind and that keeping this notion would encumber scientific progress. His view is that the class of concepts really divides into three distinct yet co-referential kinds of bodies of knowledge typically used in distinct cognitive processes. The main purpose of this paper is to challenge Machery’s eliminativist conclusion on the grounds that his alternative to concepts fails to be combined with any prominent account of content determination. As a case of philosophical scrutiny of a psychological proposal, the paper also intends to show how philosophical and psychological interests in concepts can be brought together.
Description
item.page.coverage.spatial
item.page.sponsorship
Citation
Erkenntnis, June 2017, pp 1–21
Keywords
concepts, content, meaning, mental representations, eliminativism, heterogeneity hypothesis, psychological explanation, categorization