Publication:
Bespoke science: the use of ad hoc scientific advisory committees in the Covid-19 pandemic

Simple item page
dc.contributor.authorKoppl, Roger
dc.contributor.authorPronin, Kira
dc.contributor.authorCowen, Nick
dc.contributor.authorPodemska-Mikluch, Mart
dc.contributor.authorPaniagua, Pablo
dc.date.accessioned2026-09-28T15:38:41Z
dc.date.available2026-09-28T15:38:41Z
dc.date.issued2025
dc.description.abstractMany governments formed ad hoc scientific advisory committees in the Covid-19 pandemic because they offered the government greater control over policy advice than standing agencies. The difference between ad hoc and standing advisory bodies has been little noted in the literature. High-uncertainty crises demanding expertise and requiring action from the national government increase the value of policy discretion, raising the value of controlling the scientific narrative. An ad hoc body is generally easier to control than a standing body because policymakers have greater liberty to choose its members, specify its mandate, and disband and reconstitute it when needed. Control generally requires either a narrow membership or a narrow mandate. If members cannot be chosen to be reliably aligned with the government or its policy preferences, a narrow mandate will restrain the committee from offering undesired advice or analysis. Our argument builds on the public choice assumption of motivational symmetry: The choices of scientists and politicians are shaped by the same motives and desires that influence individuals in any other sphere of life. Our case studies of Italy, UK, US, Poland, Uganda, and Sweden support our theory.
dc.description.versionVersión publicada
dc.format.extent24 p.
dc.identifier.citationKoppl, R., Pronin, K., Cowen, N. et al. Bespoke science: the use of ad hoc scientific advisory committees in the Covid-19 pandemic. Public Choice 205, 513–536 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-025-01299-w
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-025-01299-w
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11447/11191
dc.language.isoen
dc.subjectPublic health
dc.subjectPolicy discretion
dc.subjectPolicy legitimacy
dc.subjectExperts
dc.subjectExpertise
dc.subjectScientific advice
dc.subjectScientific advisory bodies
dc.subjectScientific advisory committees
dc.subjectScientific advisory boards
dc.subjectCovid-19
dc.subjectPandemic
dc.subjectPublic choice
dc.titleBespoke science: the use of ad hoc scientific advisory committees in the Covid-19 pandemic
dc.typeArticle
dcterms.accessRightsAcceso abierto
dcterms.sourcePublic Choice
dspace.entity.typePublication

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
s11127-025-01299-w.pdf
Size:
1.08 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Download
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
347 B
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description:
Download

Collections

Artículos Humanidades

Implementado por OpenGeek Services