Browsing by Author "Miller, William R."
Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
Results Per Page
Sort Options
Item Managing All the Genotypic Knowledge: Approach to a Septic Patient Colonized by Different Enterobacteriales with Unique Carbapenemases(2019) Park, Stacy C.; Wailan, Alexander M.; Barry, Katie E.; Vegesana, Kasi; Carroll, Joanne; Mathers, Amy J.; Miller, William R.; Munita, JoséThe recent development of new antimicrobials active against carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriales (CPE) has brought new hope for the treatment of infections due to these organisms. However, the evolving epidemiology of bacteria with carbapenemases may complicate management, as providers are faced with treating patients colonized by bacteria producing multiple carbapenemases. Here, we present the clinical course and treatment of Raoultella planticola bacteremia in a cirrhotic patient known to be colonized with both blaKPC- and blaOXA-48-carrying organisms.Item Real-world Performance of Susceptibility Testing for Ceftolozane/Tazobactam Against Non-Carbapenemase-Producing Carbapenem-Resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa(2021) Rivas, Lina; Alcalde-Rico, Manuel; Martínez, José R.; Moreno, Victoria; Rojas, Pamela; Wozniak, Aniela; García, Patricia; Olivares, Jorge; Miller, William R.; Arias, Cesar A.; Khan, Ayesha; Munita, JoséCeftolozane/tazbactam (C/T) is a potent anti-pseudomonal agent that has clinical utility against infections caused by non-carbapenemase producing carbapenem-resistant P. aeruginosa (non-CP-CR-PA). Accurate, precise and reliable antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) is crucial to guide clinical decisions. However, studies assessing the performance of different AST methods against non-CP-CR-PA- (the main clinical niche for C/T), are lacking. Here, we evaluated performance of gradient strips (Etest and MIC test strip (MTS), and disk diffusion (DD) using CLSI breakpoints. Additionally, we assessed the performance of DD using EUCAST breakpoints. For all susceptibility tests, we used a collection of 97 non-CP-CR-PA clinical isolates recovered from 11 Chilean hospitals. Both gradient strips and DD had acceptable performance when using CLSI breakpoints, yielding a categorical agreement (CA) of >90% and 92%, respectively. In contrast, DD using EUCAST breakpoints performed sub-optimally (CA 81%). MTS yielded a higher essential agreement (EA, >90%) than Etest (84%). Importantly, the performance of all methods varied significantly when the isolates were stratified by their degree of susceptibility to other anti-pseudomonal β-lactams. All methods had 100% CA when testing isolates that were pan-susceptible to all β-lactams (Pan-β-S). However, the CA markedly decreased when testing isolates resistant to all β-lactams (Pan-β-R). Indeed, the CA was 81% for Etest (6 errors), 78% for MTS (7 errors) and 78% and 56% for DD when using CLSI (7 errors) or EUCAST breakpoints (14 errors), respectively. Our results suggest that all manual AST methods have strikingly decreased performance in the context of Pan-β-R P. aeruginosa with potentially major clinical implications.