Browsing by Author "Hoshino, Masahiro"
Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
Results Per Page
Sort Options
Publication Homogeneity of the coronary microcirculation in angina with non-obstructive coronary artery disease(2025) Hoshino, Masahiro; Hoek, Roel; Jukema, Ruurt; Dahdal, Jorge; Van Diemen, Pepijn; Raijmakers, Pieter; Driessen, Roel; Twisk, Jos; Danad, Ibrahim; Kakuta, Tsunekazu; Knuuti, Juhani; Knaapen, PaulAims: The homogeneity of coronary microvascular dysfunction (CMD) across different myocardial territories in angina with non-obstructive coronary artery disease (ANOCA) patients is scarcely explored. This study investigates the variability in microvascular resistance reserve (MRR) across the 3 main perfusion territories of the coronary circulation to investigate the homogeneity or dishomogeneity of microcirculatory function. Methods and results: This post hoc analysis of the PACIFIC trials included symptomatic ANOCA patients with [15O]H2O positron emission tomography (PET) and three-vessel invasive fractional flow reserve (FFR). MRR was computed in the three main coronary branches by integrating PET-derived coronary flow reserve and invasive FFR. A total of 155 patients (50% male, age 59 ± 10 years) and 465 vessels (MRR: 3.92 ± 1.21) were included. There were no significant differences in MRR among the three coronary branches. Correlations in MRR among the three coronary branches were good (r = 0.76 to 0.86). The mean difference between MRR measurements in different arteries was small (2.4 to 7.5%), without any consistent directional bias. The overall intra-class correlation coefficient for absolute agreement was 0.80 (95% CI: 0.74-0.85), indicating good single-measure reliability. Approximately 80% (123/155) of patients showed diagnostic concordance of CMD (MRR ≤3.0) across the three vessels. Conclusion: In most ANOCA patients, microvascular function is homogeneously distributed across the three major coronary territories. Single-artery testing may suffice in many cases, aligning with guidelines. However, some patients exhibit notable inter-territorial variation, suggesting that multi-vessel evaluation may be prudent in borderline scenarios.Publication Impact of myocardial scar burden on microvascular resistance reserve in patients with coronary artery disease(2026) Hoshino, Masahiro; Hoek, Roel; Jukema, Ruurt; Dahdal, Jorge; Van Diemen, Pepijn; Hopman, Luuk; Raijmakers, Pieter; Driessen, Roel; Twisk , Jos; Danad, Ibrahim; Kakuta, Tsunekazu; Knuuti, Juhani; Knaapen, PaulPurpose: The impact of myocardial scar on coronary microcirculation is not well understood. This study aims to evaluate the association between microvascular resistance reserve (MRR) and scar tissue. Methods: In this post-hoc analysis of the PACIFIC 2 trial, symptomatic patients with prior myocardial infarction (MI) and/or percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) underwent [15O]H2O positron emission tomography (PET), cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging, and fractional flow reserve (FFR). MRR was assessed utilizing PET-derived coronary flow reserve and FFR measurements. Scar quantification was assessed by CMR late gadolinium enhancement (LGE). Vessel LGE burden was defined as the scar tissue proportion in each myocardial territory. Total LGE burden was defined as the proportion of overall scar. Results: The study included 154 patients with 397 vessels with a mean MRR of 3.56 ± 1.24. Patients with any scar tissues (LGE > 0%) exhibited a lower MRR in every myocardial territory than those without scar tissues. After adjusting for cardiovascular risk factors, either vessel LGE burden (β =-0.013, P = 0.006) or total LGE burden (β =-0.039, P = 0.002) independently predicted a reduced MRR. Compared to myocardial territories without scar tissues (LGE burdens = 0%), MRR was significantly lower in myocardial territories with vessel LGE burden = 0% + total LGE burden > 0%, and in myocardial territories with both LGE burdens > 0%. Conclusion: Scar burden was negatively associated with MRR in patients with prior MI and/or PCI. Our findings indicate that both the proportion of myocardial scar in the vascular territory and the overall myocardial scar affect the microcirculation of individual vascular territories. Clinical trial number: Not applicable