Browsing by Author "Cruzat, Josephine"
Now showing 1 - 3 of 3
Results Per Page
Sort Options
Publication Dementia prevention requires moving beyond individual choice: the costs of effort and time intersect with social determinants of health(2025) Migeot, Joaquín; Araya, Daniel; Montecinos, Matias; Baez, Sandra; Behrens, Maria Isabel; Castaner, Olga; Cruzat, Josephine; Delgado, Carolina; De Jong- Bambagioni, David; Duran, Claudia; Durón, Dafne; Evans, Tavia; Gonzalez, Raul; Gutiérrez, Myriam; Hayden, Katheen; Hernandez, Hernan; Ibañez, Agustin; Legaz, Agustina; Miller, Johnny; Ma iulskyt, Sonata; Putthinun, Pongpat; Santamaría, Hernando; Slachevsky Chonchol, Andrea; Trépel, DominicSocial determinants of health strongly influence modifiable risk factors for dementia, yet prevention frameworks list only individual-level behaviours and conditions, overlooking the impact of social and environmental factors on the risk of dementia. In this perspective, we introduce the concept of non-monetary costs as a central mechanism through which social determinants shape modifiable risk factors by influencing individuals' ability to adopt healthy behaviours. Drawing from economic theory, we define non-monetary costs as the time and metabolic cost, perceived by individuals as physical and cognitive effort, required to engage in healthy behaviours. Under adverse social determinants of health, individuals effectively lack choice, as the non-monetary costs required to engage in healthy behaviours become prohibitively high. We propose a framework that links social determinants of health adversity to increased dementia risk through non-monetary costs. We apply this framework to each of the fourteen modifiable risk factors for dementia identified by the Lancet Commission, demonstrating how these costs systematically elevate risk in populations facing social adversity. Finally, we explore the implications of incorporating non-monetary cost assessments across research, interventions, clinical care, and public policy. We propose that quantifying and addressing these costs is essential for designing equitable, scalable, and contextually grounded strategies for dementia prevention across socially diverse populations.Publication Educational disparities in brain health and dementia across Latin America and the United States(2024) Gonzalez, Raul; Legaz, Agustina; Moguilner, Sebastián; Cruzat, Josephine; Hernández, Hernán; Baez, Sandra; Cocchi, Rafael; Coronel, Carlos; Medel,Vicente; Tagliazuchi, Enzo; Migeot, Joaquín; Ochoa, Carolina; Maito, Marcelo; Reyes, Pablo; Santamaria, Hernando; Godoy, Maria; Javande, Shireen; García, Adolfo; Matallana, Diana; Avila, José; Slachevsky Chonchol, Andrea; Behrens, María; Custodio, Nilton; Cardona, Juan; Brusco, Ignacio; Bruno, Martín; Sosa, Ana; Pina, Stefanie; Takada, Leonel; França, Elisa; Valcour, Victor; Possin, Katherine; De Oliveira, Maira; Lopera, Francisco; Lawlor, Brian; Hu, Kun; Miller, Bruce; Yokoyama, Jennifer; Gonzalez, Cecilia; Ibañez, AgustinBackground: Education influences brain health and dementia. However, its impact across regions, specifically Latin America (LA) and the United States (US), is unknown. Methods: A total of 1412 participants comprising controls, patients with Alzheimer's disease (AD), and frontotemporal lobar degeneration (FTLD) from LA and the US were included. We studied the association of education with brain volume and functional connectivity while controlling for imaging quality and variability, age, sex, total intracranial volume (TIV), and recording type. Results: Education influenced brain measures, explaining 24%-98% of the geographical differences. The educational disparities between LA and the US were associated with gray matter volume and connectivity variations, especially in LA and AD patients. Education emerged as a critical factor in classifying aging and dementia across regions. Discussion: The results underscore the impact of education on brain structure and function in LA, highlighting the importance of incorporating educational factors into diagnosing, care, and prevention, and emphasizing the need for global diversity in research. Highlights: Lower education was linked to reduced brain volume and connectivity in healthy controls (HCs), Alzheimer's disease (AD), and frontotemporal lobar degeneration (FTLD). Latin American cohorts have lower educational levels compared to the those in the United States. Educational disparities majorly drive brain health differences between regions. Educational differences were significant in both conditions, but more in AD than FTLD. Education stands as a critical factor in classifying aging and dementia across regions.Publication Qualitative and quantitative educational disparities and brain signatures in healthy aging and dementia across global settings(2025) Gonzalez, Raul; Cruzat, Josephine; Hernández, Hernán; Migeot, Joaquín; Legaz, Agustina; Santamaria, Hernando; Fittipaldi, Sol; Maito, Marcelo; Medel, Vicente; Tagliazucchi, Enzo; Barttfeld, Pablo; Franco-O'Byrne, Daniel; Castro, Ana; Borquez, Patricio; Avila, José; Behrens, Maria Isabel; Custodio, Nilton; Farombi, Temitope; García, Adolfo; Garcia, Indira; Godoy, Maria; Gonzalez, Cecilia; Hu, Kun; Lawlor, Brian; Matallana, Diana; Miller, Bruce; Okada, Maira; Pina, Stefanie; França, Elisa de Paula; Reyes, Pablo; Slachevsky Chonchol, Andrea; Takada, Leonel; Yener, Görsev; Coronel, Carlos; Ibañez, AgustinBackground: While education is crucial for brain health, evidence mainly relies on individual measures of years of education (YoE), neglecting education quality (EQ). The effect of YoE and EQ on aging and dementia has not been compared. Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional assessment of the effect of EQ and YoE on brain health in 7533 subjects from 20 countries, including healthy controls (HCs), Alzheimer's disease (AD), and frontotemporal lobar degeneration (FTLD). EQ was based on country-level quality indicators provided by the programme for international student assessment (PISA). After applying neuroimage harmonization, we examined its effect, along with YoE, on gray matter volume and functional connectivity. Regression models were adjusted for age, sex, and cognition, controlling for multiple comparisons. The influence of image quality was assessed through sensitivity analysis. Data collection was conducted between June 1 and October 30, 2024. Findings: Less EQ and YoE were associated with brain alterations across groups. However, EQ had a stronger influence, mainly targeting the critical areas of each condition. At the whole-brain level, EQ influenced volume (HCs: Δmean = 2·0 [1·9-2·0] × 10-2, p < 10-5; AD: Δmean = 0·1 [-0·0 to 0·3] × 10-2, p = 0·18; FTLD: Δmean = 3·5 [3·0-4·0] × 10-2, p < 10-5; all with 95% confidence intervals) and networks (HCs: Δmean = 13·5 [13·2-13·7] × 10-2, p < 10-5; AD: Δmean = 5·9 [5·2-6·7] × 10-2, p < 10-5; FTLD: Δmean = 13·2 [11·2-13·7] × 10-2, p < 10-5) 1·3 to 7·0 times more than YoE. These effects remain robust despite variations in income and socioeconomic factors at country and individual levels. Interpretation: The results support the need to incorporate education quality into studying and improving brain health, underscoring the importance of country-level measures. Funding: Multi-partner consortium to expand dementia research in Latin America (ReDLat).