Minimally Invasive Methods for Staging in Lung Cancer: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
dc.contributor.author | Labarca, Gonzalo | |
dc.contributor.author | Aravena, Carlos | |
dc.contributor.author | Ortega, Francisco | |
dc.contributor.author | Arenas, Alex | |
dc.contributor.author | Majid, Adnan | |
dc.contributor.author | Folch, Erik | |
dc.contributor.author | Mehta, Hiren | |
dc.contributor.author | Jantz, Michael | |
dc.contributor.author | Fernández-Bussy, Sebastián | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2017-08-08T21:14:13Z | |
dc.date.available | 2017-08-08T21:14:13Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2016 | |
dc.description.abstract | Introduction. Endobronchial ultrasound (EBUS) is a procedure that provides access to the mediastinal staging; however, EBUS cannot be used to stage all of the nodes in the mediastinum. In these cases, endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) is used for complete staging. Objective. To provide a synthesis of the evidence on the diagnostic performance of EBUS + EUS in patients undergoing mediastinal staging. Methods. Systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the diagnostic yield of EBUS + EUS compared with surgical staging. Two researchers performed the literature search, quality assessments, data extractions, and analyses. We produced a meta-analysis including sensitivity, specificity, and likelihood ratio analysis. Results. Twelve primary studies (1515 patients) were included; two were randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and ten were prospective trials. The pooled sensitivity for combined EBUS + EUS was 87% (CI 84–89%) and the specificity was 99% (CI 98–100%). For EBUS + EUS performed with a single bronchoscope group, the sensitivity improved to 88% (CI 83.1–91.4%) and specificity improved to 100% (CI 99-100%). Conclusion. EBUS + EUS is a highly accurate and safe procedure. The combined procedure should be considered in selected patients with lymphadenopathy noted at stations that are not traditionally accessible with conventional EBUS. | |
dc.format.extent | 11 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Labarca G, Aravena C, Ortega F, Arenas A, Majid A, Folch E, Mehta HJ, Jantz MA, Fernandez-Bussy S. Minimally Invasive Methods for Staging in Lung Cancer: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Pulm Med. 2016;2016:1024709. | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/11447/1544 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/1024709 | |
dc.language.iso | en_US | |
dc.publisher | Hindawi Publishing Corp. | |
dc.subject | Endobronchial ultrasound (EBUS) | |
dc.subject | Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) | |
dc.subject | Mediastinal staging | |
dc.subject | meta-analysis | |
dc.title | Minimally Invasive Methods for Staging in Lung Cancer: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis | |
dc.type | Artículo |
Files
Original bundle
1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
- Name:
- Minimally Invasive Methods for Staging in Lung Cancer____COMPLETO.pdf
- Size:
- 1.4 MB
- Format:
- Adobe Portable Document Format
- Description:
- Texto completo