Rationale, design, and progress of the ENhanced Control of Hypertension ANd Thrombolysis strokE stuDy (ENCHANTED) trial: An international multicenter 2 × 2 quasi-factorial randomized controlled trial of low- vs. standard-dose rt-PA and early intensive vs. guideline-recommended blood pressure lowering in patients with acute ischaemic stroke eligible for thrombolysis treatment
dc.contributor.author | Huang, Yining | |
dc.contributor.author | Sharma, Vijay | |
dc.contributor.author | Robinson, Thompson | |
dc.contributor.author | Lindley, Richard | |
dc.contributor.author | Chen, Xiaoying | |
dc.contributor.author | Kim, Jong Sung | |
dc.contributor.author | Lavados, Pablo | |
dc.contributor.author | Olavarría, Verónica | |
dc.contributor.author | Arima, Hisatomi | |
dc.contributor.author | Fuentes, Sully | |
dc.contributor.author | Nguyen, Huy Thang | |
dc.contributor.author | Lee, Tsong-Hai | |
dc.contributor.author | Parsons, Mark | |
dc.contributor.author | Levi, Christopher | |
dc.contributor.author | Demchuk, Andrew | |
dc.contributor.author | Bath, Philip | |
dc.contributor.author | Broderick, Joseph | |
dc.contributor.author | Donnan, Geoffrey | |
dc.contributor.author | Martins, Sheila | |
dc.contributor.author | Pontes-Neto, Octavio | |
dc.contributor.author | Silva, Federico | |
dc.contributor.author | Pandian, Jeyaraj | |
dc.contributor.author | Ricci, Stefano | |
dc.contributor.author | Stapf, Christian | |
dc.contributor.author | Woodward, Mark | |
dc.contributor.author | Wang, Jiguang | |
dc.contributor.author | Chalmers, John | |
dc.contributor.author | Anderson, Craig | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2017-05-04T20:00:32Z | |
dc.date.available | 2017-05-04T20:00:32Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2015 | |
dc.description.abstract | RATIONALE: Controversy exists over the optimal dose of intravenous (i.v.) recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (rt-PA) and degree of blood pressure (BP) control in acute ischaemic stroke (AIS). Asian studies suggest low-dose (0·6 mg/kg) is more efficacious than standard-dose (0·9 mg/kg) i.v. rt-PA, and guidelines recommend reducing systolic BP to <185 mmHg before and <180 mmHg after use of i.v. rt-PA, despite observational studies indicating better outcomes at much lower (<140 mmHg) systolic BP levels in this patient group. AIMS: The study aims to assess in thrombolysis-eligible AIS patients whether: (i) low-dose (0·6 mg/kg body weight; maximum 60 mg) i.v. rt-PA has non-inferior efficacy and lower risk of symptomatic intracerebral haemorrhage (sICH) compared to standard-dose (0·9 mg/kg body weight; maximum 90 mg) i.v. rt-PA; and (ii) early intensive BP lowering (systolic target 130-140 mmHg) has superior efficacy and lower risk of any ICH compared to guideline-recommended BP control (systolic target < 180 mmHg). DESIGN: The ENhanced Control of Hypertension And Thrombolysis strokE stuDy (ENCHANTED) trial is an independent,2 × 2 quasi-factorial, active-comparison, prospective, randomized, open blinded endpoint (PROBE), clinical trial that is evaluating Arm [A] 'rt-PA dose' and/or Arm [B] 'BP control', using central Internet randomization and data collection in patients fulfilling local criteria for thrombolysis and clinician uncertainty over the study treatments. The treatment arms will be analyzed separately. STUDY OUTCOMES: The primary study outcome in both trial Arms is death or disability according to the modified Rankin scale (mRS, scores 2-6) assessed at 90 days. Secondary outcomes include sICH, any ICH, a shift ('improvement') in function across mRS scores, separately on death and disability, early neurological deterioration, recurrent major vascular events, health-related quality of life, length of hospital stay, need for permanent residential care, and health care costs. RESULTS: Following launch of the trial in February 2012, the study has recruited more than 2500 patients across a global network of approximately 100 sites in 15 countries. The required sample sizes are 3300 for Arm [A] and 2300 for Arm [B], which will provide >90% power to detect non-inferiority of low-dose i.v. rt-PA and superiority of intensive BP lowering on the primary clinical outcome, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Low-dose i.v. rt-PA and early intensive BP lowering could provide more affordable and safer use of thrombolysis treatment for patients with AIS worldwide. | |
dc.format.extent | 11 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Int J Stroke. 2015 Jul;10(5):778-788 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/11447/1195 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ijs.12486 | |
dc.language.iso | en_US | |
dc.publisher | Sage Publications | |
dc.subject | Alteplase | |
dc.subject | Acute ischaemic stroke | |
dc.subject | Dose | |
dc.subject | Hypertension | |
dc.subject | Rt-PA | |
dc.subject | Thrombolysis | |
dc.title | Rationale, design, and progress of the ENhanced Control of Hypertension ANd Thrombolysis strokE stuDy (ENCHANTED) trial: An international multicenter 2 × 2 quasi-factorial randomized controlled trial of low- vs. standard-dose rt-PA and early intensive vs. guideline-recommended blood pressure lowering in patients with acute ischaemic stroke eligible for thrombolysis treatment | |
dc.type | Artículo |
Files
Original bundle
1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
- Name:
- Rationale, design, and progress of the ENhanced Control of Hypertension ANd Thrombolysis strokE stuDy (ENCHANTED) trial___Resumen.pdf
- Size:
- 207.02 KB
- Format:
- Adobe Portable Document Format
- Description:
- Resumen