Antimicrobial resistance in wildlife and in the built environment in a wildlife rehabilitation center

dc.contributor.authorBaros Jorquera, Carla
dc.contributor.authorMoreno-Switt, Andrea I.
dc.contributor.authorSallaberry Pincheira, Nicole
dc.contributor.authorMunita, José
dc.contributor.authorFlores Navarro, Camila
dc.contributor.authorTardone, Rodolfo
dc.contributor.authorGonzález-Rocha, Gerardo
dc.contributor.authorSinger, Randall S.
dc.contributor.authorBueno, Irene
dc.date.accessioned2022-03-16T21:10:39Z
dc.date.available2022-03-16T21:10:39Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.description.abstractInjured and orphaned wildlife are often brought to Wildlife Rehabilitation Centers (WRC) to be cared for by professionals to ultimately be released back to their natural habitats. In these centers, animals may spend months and frequently receive prolonged antibiotic therapy. Therefore, WRC may play a role in the emergence and dissemination of antimicrobial resistance (AMR). The goal of this study was to investigate the presence and antibiotic resistance profiles of Gram-negative bacteria with reduced susceptibility to cephalosporins in both the wildlife admitted to a WRC and in the WRC built environment in Chile. A cross-sectional study was conducted sampling animals undergoing rehabilitation (n =64) and the WRC environment (n =160). Isolated bacterial species were identified with MALDI-TOF, and antimicrobial susceptibility determined using the disk diffusion method. Enterobacteriaceae and Pseudomonadaceae were the dominant bacterial families among the environ-mental (n =78) and animal (n =31) isolates. For Enterobacteriaceae, isolates of the most abundant species (E. coli) were classified into 20 antibiotic resistance profiles, with eight of those isolates being resistant to more than nine antibiotics, including imipenem. Isolates of the Pseudomonadaceae family identified 11 isolates with resistance to antibiotics such as carbapenems and quinolones. Even though a cluster analysis based on antibiotic resistance patterns did not show a clear overlap between environmental and animal isolates, it is important to highlight the identification of isolates resistant to carbapenems, which is very relevant from a public health perspective. Further, numerous antibiotic resistance profiles were observed in different bacterial species, indi-cating not only environmental contamination with a wide diversity of bacteria, but also a wide diversity of resistant bacteria in animals at the WRC. The approach taken by sampling animals and their hospital environ-ment can be useful in understanding AMR dynamics in wildlife rehabilitation settings, as well as the potential dissemination of AMR into the natural environment.es
dc.description.versionVersión publicadaes
dc.identifier.citationCarla Baros Jorquera, Andrea I. Moreno-Switt, Nicole Sallaberry-Pincheira, Jose M. Munita, Camila Flores Navarro, Rodolfo Tardone, Gerardo González-Rocha, Randall S. Singer, Irene Bueno, Antimicrobial resistance in wildlife and in the built environment in a wildlife rehabilitation center, One Health, Volume 13, 2021, 100298, ISSN 2352-7714, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.onehlt.2021.100298es
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.onehlt.2021.100298es
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11447/5734
dc.language.isoenes
dc.subjectWildlifees
dc.subjectAntimicrobial resistancees
dc.subjectAntibiotices
dc.subjectCluster analysises
dc.titleAntimicrobial resistance in wildlife and in the built environment in a wildlife rehabilitation centeres
dc.typeArticlees
dcterms.sourceOne Healthes

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
AMR & wildlife_OneHealth_2021.pdf
Size:
1.11 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.71 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: