Formas de revisión ética de proyectos de investigación biomédica
Date
2017
Type:
Artículo
item.page.extent
7
item.page.accessRights
item.contributor.advisor
ORCID:
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Sociedad Medica de Santiago
item.page.isbn
item.page.issn
item.page.issne
item.page.doiurl
item.page.other
item.page.references
Abstract
Ten years after the approval of the Chilean bill that regulates scientific
research in humans (Law Nº 20.120), and considering the current status of
accreditation and training of many Research Ethics Committee (REC), it is
necessary to analyze their performance. We analyzed the Chilean experience
with REC aiming to propose a differential type of review, considering the risks
to research participants. To improve the quality of the review and the efficiency
of these committees, we propose to differentiate the revisions depending on the
type of project, its methods and its risks. Initially, the types of review should be
classified as exempt from review, expedited review and full review by the committee.
In this proposal the type of review is confirmed or can be modified by a
designated member of the committee after an initial review of the project. Thus,
the deliberation and review times of the committee could be optimized avoiding
delays in their revision.
Description
item.page.coverage.spatial
item.page.sponsorship
Citation
Portales MB, Michaud P, Salas SP, Beca JP. Formas de Revisión Ética de Proyectos de Investigación Biomédica [Differentiated review of biomedical research projects by ethics committees]. Rev Med Chil. 2017 Mar;145(3):386-392
Keywords
Bioethics, Ethics Committees, Research, Ethics, Institutional, Ethics, Research