Institutional Repository UDD

Dysphagia screening and risks of pneumonia and adverse outcomes after acute stroke: An international multicenter study

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Ouyang, Menglu
dc.contributor.author Boaden, Elizabeth
dc.contributor.author Arima, Hisatomi
dc.contributor.author Lavados, Pablo
dc.contributor.author Billot, Laurent
dc.contributor.author Hackett, Maree
dc.contributor.author Olavarría, Verónica
dc.contributor.author Muñoz-Venturelli, Paula
dc.contributor.author Song, Lili
dc.contributor.author Rogers, Kris
dc.contributor.author Middleton, Sandy
dc.contributor.author Pontes-Neto, Octavio
dc.contributor.author Lee, Tsong-Hai
dc.contributor.author Watkins, Caroline
dc.contributor.author Robinson, Thompson
dc.contributor.author Anderson, Craig
dc.date.accessioned 2020-08-31T20:13:47Z
dc.date.available 2020-08-31T20:13:47Z
dc.date.issued 2019-06
dc.identifier.citation International Journal of Stroke Vol 15, Issue 2, 2020 https://doi.org/10.1177/1747493019858778 es
dc.identifier.uri https://doi.org/10.1177/1747493019858778 es
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/11447/3387
dc.description.abstract Background Dysphagia is associated with aspiration pneumonia after stroke. Data are limited on the influences of dysphagia screen and assessment in clinical practice. Aims To determine associations between a “brief” screen and “detailed” assessment of dysphagia on clinical outcomes in acute stroke patients. Methods A prospective cohort study analyzed retrospectively using data from a multicenter, cluster cross-over, randomized controlled trial (Head Positioning in Acute Stroke Trial [HeadPoST]) from 114 hospitals in nine countries. HeadPoST included 11,093 acute stroke patients randomized to lying-flat or sitting-up head positioning. Herein, we report predefined secondary analyses of the association of dysphagia screening and assessment and clinical outcomes of pneumonia and death or disability (modified Rankin scale 3–6) at 90 days. Results Overall, 8784 (79.2%) and 3917 (35.3%) patients were screened and assessed for dysphagia, respectively, but the frequency and timing for each varied widely across regions. Neither use of a screen nor an assessment for dysphagia was associated with the outcomes, but their results were compared to “screen-pass” patients, those who failed had higher risks of pneumonia (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 3.00, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 2.18–4.10) and death or disability (aOR = 1.66, 95% CI = 1.41–1.95). Similar results were evidence for the results of an assessment for dysphagia. Subsequent feeding restrictions were related to higher risk of pneumonia in patients failed dysphagia screen or assessment (aOR = 4.06, 95% CI = 1.72–9.54). Conclusions Failing a dysphagia screen is associated with increased risks of pneumonia and poor clinical outcome after acute stroke. Further studies concentrate on determining the effective subsequent feeding actions are needed to improve patient outcomes. es
dc.language.iso en es
dc.publisher Sage es
dc.subject Dysphagia es
dc.subject Screen es
dc.subject Acute stroke es
dc.subject Pneumonia es
dc.subject Disability es
dc.subject Clinical trial es
dc.title Dysphagia screening and risks of pneumonia and adverse outcomes after acute stroke: An international multicenter study es
dc.type Article es


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search DSpace


Browse

My Account