Publication:
Diagnostic performance of CCTA and CTP imaging for clinically suspected in-stent restenosis: A meta-analysis

Simple item page
dc.contributor.authorDahdal, Jorge
dc.contributor.authorJukema, Ruurt A.
dc.contributor.authorRemmelzwaal, Sharon
dc.contributor.authorRaijmakers, Pieter G.
dc.contributor.authorHarst, Pim van der
dc.contributor.authorGuglielmo, Marco
dc.contributor.authorCramer, Maarten J.
dc.contributor.authorChamuleau, Steven A.J.
dc.contributor.authorDiemen, Pepijn A. van
dc.contributor.authorKnaapen, Paul
dc.contributor.authorDanad, Ibrahim
dc.date.accessioned2025-01-27T19:15:30Z
dc.date.available2025-01-27T19:15:30Z
dc.date.issued2024
dc.description.abstractAims: The objective of this study is to conduct a meta-analysis to assess the diagnostic performance of Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography (CCTA) and a hybrid approach that incorporates Computed Tomography Perfusion (CTP) in addition to CCTA (CCTA þ CTP) for the detection of in-stent restenosis (ISR), as defined by angiography. Methods: A comprehensive search of articles identified 18,513 studies. After removing duplicates, title/abstract screening, and full-text review, 17 CCTA and 3 CCTA þ CTP studies were included. Only studies using 64-slices multidetector computed tomography (CT) were considered eligible. Results: The per-patient ISR prevalence was 43 %, with 92 % of stents fully interpretable with CCTA. Meta-analysis exhibited a per-stent CCTA (n ¼ 2674) sensitivity of 90 % (95 % CI; 84–94 %), specificity of 89 % (95 % CI; 86–92 %), positive likelihood ratio of 7.17 (95 % CI; 5.24–9.61), negative likelihood ratio of 0.17 (95 % CI; 0.10–0.25), and diagnostic odds ratio of 45.7 (95 % CI; 22.71–82.43). Additional sensitivity analyses revealed no influence of stent diameter or strut thickness on the diagnostic yield of CCTA. The per-stent diagnostic performance of CCTA þ CTP (n ¼ 752) did not show differences compared to CCTA. Conclusions: With currently utilized scanners, CCTA and CCTA þ CTP demonstrated high diagnostic performance for in-stent restenosis evaluation. Consequently, a history of previous stent implantation should not be an argument to preclude using these methods in clinically suspected patients.
dc.description.versionVersión publicada
dc.format.extent8 p.
dc.identifier.citationDahdal J, Jukema RA, Remmelzwaal S, Raijmakers PG, van der Harst P, Guglielmo M, Cramer MJ, Chamuleau SAJ, van Diemen PA, Knaapen P, Danad I. Diagnostic performance of CCTA and CTP imaging for clinically suspected in-stent restenosis: A meta-analysis. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2024 Nov 6:S1934-5925(24)00464-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jcct.2024.10.014
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcct.2024.10.014
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11447/9714
dc.language.isoen
dc.subjectCCTA
dc.subjectCTP
dc.subjectCAD
dc.subjectPCI
dc.subjectStents
dc.titleDiagnostic performance of CCTA and CTP imaging for clinically suspected in-stent restenosis: A meta-analysis
dc.typeArticle
dcterms.accessRightsAcceso abierto
dcterms.sourceJournal of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography
dspace.entity.typePublication

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
1-s2.0-S1934592524004647-main.pdf
Size:
1.03 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Download
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
347 B
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description:
Download

Collections

Artículos Medicina y Ciencias de la Salud

Implementado por OpenGeek Services