Publication:
Duration of effectiveness of vaccines against SARS-CoV-2 infection and COVID-19 disease: results of a systematic review and meta-regression

Simple item page
dc.contributor.authorFeikin, Daniel R.
dc.contributor.authorHigdon, Melissa M.
dc.contributor.authorAbu-Raddad, Laith J.
dc.contributor.authorAndrews, Nick
dc.contributor.authorAraos, Rafael
dc.contributor.authorGoldberg, Yair
dc.contributor.authorGroome, Michelle J.
dc.contributor.authorHuppert, Amit
dc.contributor.authorO'Brien, Katherine L.
dc.contributor.authorSmith, Peter G.
dc.contributor.authorWilder-Smith, Annelies
dc.contributor.authorZeger, Scott
dc.contributor.authorDeloria Knoll, María
dc.contributor.authorPatel, Minal K.
dc.date.accessioned2023-07-07T19:46:11Z
dc.date.available2023-07-07T19:46:11Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.description.abstractBackground: Knowing whether COVID-19 vaccine effectiveness wanes is crucial for informing vaccine policy, such as the need for and timing of booster doses. We aimed to systematically review the evidence for the duration of protection of COVID-19 vaccines against various clinical outcomes, and to assess changes in the rates of breakthrough infection caused by the delta variant with increasing time since vaccination. Methods: This study was designed as a systematic review and meta-regression. We did a systematic review of preprint and peer-reviewed published article databases from June 17, 2021, to Dec 2, 2021. Randomised controlled trials of COVID-19 vaccine efficacy and observational studies of COVID-19 vaccine effectiveness were eligible. Studies with vaccine efficacy or effectiveness estimates at discrete time intervals of people who had received full vaccination and that met predefined screening criteria underwent full-text review. We used random-effects meta-regression to estimate the average change in vaccine efficacy or effectiveness 1–6 months after full vaccination. Findings: Of 13 744 studies screened, 310 underwent full-text review, and 18 studies were included (all studies were carried out before the omicron variant began to circulate widely). Risk of bias, established using the risk of bias 2 tool for randomised controlled trials or the risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions tool was low for three studies, moderate for eight studies, and serious for seven studies. We included 78 vaccine-specific vaccine efficacy or effectiveness evaluations (Pfizer–BioNTech-Comirnaty, n=38; Moderna-mRNA-1273, n=23; Janssen-Ad26.COV2.S, n=9; and AstraZeneca-Vaxzevria, n=8). On average, vaccine efficacy or effectiveness against SARS-CoV-2 infection decreased from 1 month to 6 months after full vaccination by 21·0 percentage points (95% CI 13·9–29·8) among people of all ages and 20·7 percentage points (10·2–36·6) among older people (as defined by each study, who were at least 50 years old). For symptomatic COVID-19 disease, vaccine efficacy or effectiveness decreased by 24·9 percentage points (95% CI 13·4–41·6) in people of all ages and 32·0 percentage points (11·0–69·0) in older people. For severe COVID-19 disease, vaccine efficacy or effectiveness decreased by 10·0 percentage points (95% CI 6·1–15·4) in people of all ages and 9·5 percentage points (5·7–14·6) in older people. Most (81%) vaccine efficacy or effectiveness estimates against severe disease remained greater than 70% over time. Interpretation: COVID-19 vaccine efficacy or effectiveness against severe disease remained high, although it did decrease somewhat by 6 months after full vaccination. By contrast, vaccine efficacy or effectiveness against infection and symptomatic disease decreased approximately 20–30 percentage points by 6 months. The decrease in vaccine efficacy or effectiveness is likely caused by, at least in part, waning immunity, although an effect of bias cannot be ruled out. Evaluating vaccine efficacy or effectiveness beyond 6 months will be crucial for updating COVID-19 vaccine policy. Funding: Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovations.
dc.description.versionVersión publicada
dc.format.extent21 p.
dc.identifier.citationLancet. 2022 Mar 5;399(10328):924-944.
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(22)00152-0
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorio.udd.cl/handle/11447/7670
dc.language.isoes
dc.subjectVaccination
dc.subjectCOVID-19
dc.subjectSARS-CoV-2 infection
dc.subjectVaccine efficacy
dc.subjectVaccine effectiveness
dc.titleDuration of effectiveness of vaccines against SARS-CoV-2 infection and COVID-19 disease: results of a systematic review and meta-regression
dc.typeArticle
dcterms.accessRightsAcceso abierto
dcterms.sourceThe Lancet
dspace.entity.typePublication

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Duration of effectiveness of vaccines against SARS-CoV-2 infection and COVID-19 disease. Results of a systematic review and meta-regression.pdf
Size:
656.32 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Download
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.63 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description:
Download

Collections

Artículos Medicina y Ciencias de la Salud

Implementado por OpenGeek Services