Publication:
Diagnosis of knee cartilage injuries—an international Delphi consensus statement

Simple item page
dc.contributor.authorAman, Zachary
dc.contributor.authorChampagne, Allen
dc.contributor.authorHurley, Eoghan
dc.contributor.authorDanilkowicz, Richard
dc.contributor.authorCiccotti, Michael
dc.contributor.authorHirschmann, Michael
dc.contributor.authorFigueroa, Francisco
dc.contributor.authorJones, Kristofer
dc.contributor.authorMurray, Iain
dc.contributor.authorShannon, Fintan
dc.contributor.authorJazrawi, Laith
dc.contributor.authorInternational Knee Cartilage Injury Delphi Consensus Study Group
dc.date.accessioned2025-01-23T14:30:03Z
dc.date.available2025-01-23T14:30:03Z
dc.date.issued2024
dc.description.abstractIntroduction Articular cartilage injuries of the knee are a complex and challenging clinical pathology. Objectives The purpose of this study was to establish consensus statements via a Delphi process on the diagnosis of knee cartilage injuries. Methods A consensus process on knee cartilage injuries utilizing a modified Delphi technique was conducted. Seventy-nine surgeons across 17 countries participated in these consensus statements. Eleven questions were generated on the diagnosis of knee cartilage injuries, with 3 rounds of questionnaires and final voting occurring. Consensus was defined as achieving 80% to 89% agreement, whereas strong consensus was defined as 90% to 99% agreement, and unanimous consensus was defined as 100% agreement with a proposed statement. Results Of the 11 total questions and consensus statements regarding the diagnosis of knee cartilage injuries developed from 3 rounds of voting, 0 achieved unanimous consensus, 8 achieved strong consensus, and 3 achieved consensus. Conclusions The majority of the statements regarding diagnosis achieved strong consensus, which related to aspects of the physical exam and history, imaging and documentation, and assessment of concomitant injury or bony malalignment that aid in surgical decision-making. The statements that did not achieve strong consensus were determining when a lesion is symptomatic, documentation of imaging, and when a diagnostic arthroscopy is indicated.
dc.description.versionVersión Aceptada
dc.identifier.citationAman, Z. S., Champagne, A. A., Hurley, E. T., Danilkowicz, R. M., Ciccotti, M. G., Hirschmann, M. T., Figueroa, F., Jones, K. J., Murray, I. R., Shannon, F. J., & Jazrawi, L. M. (2024). Diagnosis of knee cartilage injuries—an international Delphi consensus statement. Journal of Cartilage & Joint Preservation, 4(3), 100196. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcjp.2024.100196
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcjp.2024.100196
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11447/9704
dc.language.isoen
dc.subjectConsensus
dc.subjectDelphi
dc.subjectDiagnosis
dc.subjectKnee cartilage
dc.titleDiagnosis of knee cartilage injuries—an international Delphi consensus statement
dc.typeArticle
dcterms.accessRightsAcceso Abierto
dcterms.sourceJournal of Cartilage & Joint Preservation
dspace.entity.typePublication
relation.isAuthorOfPublication89dc716a-b080-4b0d-ab6d-36e3bd26c434
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery89dc716a-b080-4b0d-ab6d-36e3bd26c434

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Diagnosis of knee cartilage injuries—an international Delphi consensus statement.pdf
Size:
712.85 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Texto Completo
Download
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
347 B
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description:
Download

Collections

Artículos Medicina y Ciencias de la Salud

Implementado por OpenGeek Services