Publication:
Risk Factors for Failure of Non-operative Management in Isolated Unilateral Non-displaced Facet Fractures of the Subaxial Cervical Spine: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Simple item page
dc.contributor.authorCirillo, Ignacio
dc.contributor.authorRicciardi, Alejandro
dc.contributor.authorCabrera, Juan Pablo
dc.contributor.authorLópez Muñoz, Felipe
dc.contributor.authorRomero Vlverde, Lyanne
dc.contributor.authorJoaquim, Andrei
dc.contributor.authorCarazzo, Charles
dc.contributor.authorYurac, Ratko
dc.date.accessioned2025-01-08T19:52:51Z
dc.date.available2025-01-08T19:52:51Z
dc.date.issued2024
dc.description.abstractStudy Design: systematic review.Objective: To evaluate risk factors associated with failure of non-operative management of isolated unilateral facet fractures ofthe subaxial cervical spine in neurologically intact patients.Methods: A systematic review of the PubMed, Embase, LILACS, and Cochrane Library databases was conducted in order todetermine risk factors associated with failure of non-operative management in isolated unilateral facet fractures of the subaxialcervical spine without facet and/or vertebral displacement, in neurologically intact patients. Our research was in line with thePRISMA Statement and registered on PROSPERO (CRD42023405699).Results: A total of 1639 studies were identified through a database search on May 5, 2023. In total, 7 studies from the databaseswere included, along with 1 study found through a manual citation search. The evidence showed high clinical heterogeneity, aserious risk of bias according to the ROBINS-I tool, and a predominance of retrospective cohort studies. In comparison to lesscomplex facet fractures, lateral floating mass fractures were found to have 5.41 times higher odds of failure of non-operativemanagement (OR = 5.41; 95% CI = 1.32, 22.19). We calculated the potential association between lower absolute fracture heightand non-operative treatment success [Fracture height (percentage) Mean Difference = 17.51 ( 28.22, 6.79 95% CI); Absolute height Mean Difference: 0.46 ( 0.60, 0.31 95% CI)]. Other risk factors were not included in the meta-analysis dueto lack of data. The level of certainty was rated as “very low”.Conclusions: Lateral floating mass cervical facet fractures and larger fracture fragment size (measured either in absolute termsor as a percentage) are significant risk factors for failure of non-operative treatment.
dc.description.versionVersión publicada
dc.format.extent13 p.
dc.identifier.citationCirillo I, Ricciardi GA, Cabrera JP, et al. Risk Factors for Failure of Non-operative Management in Isolated Unilateral Non-displaced Facet Fractures of the Subaxial Cervical Spine: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Global Spine Journal. 2024;0(0). doi:10.1177/21925682241304351
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1177/21925682241304351
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11447/9588
dc.language.isoen
dc.subjectTrauma
dc.subjectFacet fracture
dc.subjectIsolated
dc.subjectRisk factors
dc.subjectFailure
dc.subjectNon operative
dc.titleRisk Factors for Failure of Non-operative Management in Isolated Unilateral Non-displaced Facet Fractures of the Subaxial Cervical Spine: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
dc.typeArticle
dcterms.accessRightsAcceso abierto
dcterms.sourceGlobal Spine Journal
dspace.entity.typePublication
relation.isAuthorOfPublication631830b2-9e94-4f76-bf44-70d266274dbc
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery631830b2-9e94-4f76-bf44-70d266274dbc

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
cirillo-et-al-2024-risk-factors-for-failure-of-non-operative-management-in-isolated-unilateral-non-displaced-facet.pdf
Size:
1.19 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Download
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
347 B
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description:
Download

Collections

Artículos Medicina y Ciencias de la Salud

Implementado por OpenGeek Services