Person: Repetto, Gabriela
Loading...
Email Address
Birth Date
2 results
¿Qué estás buscando?
Search Results
Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
Publication Gathering the Stakeholder’s Perspective: Experiences and Opportunities in Rare Genetic Disease Research(2023) White, Lauren; Crowley, Blaine; Finucane, Brenda; McClellan, Emily; Donoghue, Sarah; Garcia, Sixto; Repetto, Gabriela; Fischer, Matthias; Jacquemont, Sebastien; Gur, Raquel; Maillard, Anne; Donald, Kirsten; Bassett, Anne; Swillen, Ann; McDonald, DonnaBackground: Research participant feedback is rarely collected; therefore, investigators have limited understanding regarding stakeholders’ (affected individuals/caregivers) motivation to participate. Members of the Genes to Mental Health Network (G2MH) surveyed stakeholders affected by copy number variants (CNVs) regarding perceived incentives for study participation, opinions concerning research priorities, and the necessity for future funding. Respondents were also asked about feelings of preparedness, research burden, and satisfaction with research study participation. Methods: Modified validated surveys were used to assess stakeholders´ views across three domains: (1) Research Study Enrollment, Retainment, Withdrawal, and Future Participation; (2) Overall Research Experience, Burden, and Preparedness; (3) Research Priorities and Obstacles. Top box score analyses were performed. Results: A total of 704 stakeholders´ responded from 29 countries representing 55 CNVs. The top reasons for initial participation in the research included reasons related to education and altruism. The top reasons for leaving a research study included treatment risks and side effects. The importance of sharing research findings and laboratory results with stakeholders was underscored by participants. Most stakeholders reported positive research experiences. Conclusions: This study provides important insight into how individuals and families affected with a rare CNV feel toward research participation and their overall experience in rare disease research. There are clear targets for areas of improvement for study teams, although manystakeholders reported positive research experiences. Key findings from this international survey may help advance collaborative research and improve the experience of participants, investigators, and other stakeholders moving forward.Publication Updated clinical practice recommendations for managing children with 22q11.2 deletion syndrome(2023) Óskarsdóttir, Sólveig; Boot, Erik; Blaine Crowley, Terrence; Loo, Joanne; Arganbright, Jill; Armando, Marco; Baylis, Adriane; Breetvelt, Elemi; Castelein, René; Chadehumbe, Madeline; Cielo, Christopher; De Reuver, Steven; Eliez, Stephan; Fiksinsk, Ania; Forbes, Brian; Gallagher, Emily; Hopkins, Sarah; Jackson, Oksana; Levitz-Katz, Lorraine; Klingberg, Gunilla; Lambert, Michele; Marino, Bruno; Mascarenhas, Maria; Moldenhauer, Julie; Moss, Edward; Nowakowska, Beata; Orchanian-Cheff, Ani; Putotto, Carolina; Repetto, Gabriela; Schindewolf, Erica; Schneider, Maude; Solot, Cynthia; Sullivan, Kathleen; Swillen, Ann; Unolt, Marta; Van Batavia, Jason; Vingerhoets, Claudia; Vorstman, Jacob; Bassett, Anne; McDonald, DonnaThis review aimed to update the clinical practice guidelines for managing children and adolescents with 22q11.2 deletion syndrome (22q11.2DS). The 22q11.2 Society, the international scientific organization studying chromosome 22q11.2 differences and related conditions, recruited expert clinicians worldwide to revise the original 2011 pediatric clinical practice guidelines in a stepwise process: (1) a systematic literature search (1992-2021), (2) study selection and data extraction by clinical experts from 9 different countries, covering 24 subspecialties, and (3) creation of a draft consensus document based on the literature and expert opinion, which was further shaped by survey results from family support organizations regarding perceived needs. Of 2441 22q11.2DS-relevant publications initially identified, 2344 received full-text reviews, including 1545 meeting criteria for potential relevance to clinical care of children and adolescents. Informed by the available literature, recommendations were formulated. Given evidence base limitations, multidisciplinary recommendations represent consensus statements of good practice for this evolving field. These recommendations provide contemporary guidance for evaluation, surveillance, and management of the many 22q11.2DS-associated physical, cognitive, behavioral, and psychiatric morbidities while addressing important genetic counseling and psychosocial issues.