Person: Araos Bralic, Rafael Ignacio
Loading...
Email Address
Birth Date
Research Projects
Organizational Units
Job Title
Last Name
Araos Bralic
First Name
Rafael Ignacio
Name
3 results
¿Qué estás buscando?
Search Results
Now showing 1 - 3 of 3
Publication Effectiveness of an inactivated SARS-CoV-2 vaccine in children and adolescents: a large-scale observational study(2023) Jara, Alejandro; Undurraga, Eduardo; Flores, Juan; Zubizarreta, José; González, Cecilia; Pizarro, Alejandra; Ortuño, Duniel; Acevedo, Johanna; Leo, Katherinne; Paredes, Fabio; Bralic , Tomás; Vergara, Verónica; Leon, Francisco; Parot, Ignacio; Leighton, Paulina; Suárez, Pamela; Rios, Juan; García, Heriberto; Rafael Araos; Araos Bralic, Rafael IgnacioBackground: Policymakers urgently need evidence to adequately balance the costs and benefits of mass vaccination against COVID-19 across all age groups, including children and adolescents. In this study, we aim to assess the effectiveness of CoronaVac's primary series among children and adolescents in Chile. Methods: We used a large prospective national cohort of about two million children and adolescents 6-16 years to estimate the effectiveness of an inactivated SARS-CoV-2 vaccine (CoronaVac) in preventing laboratory-confirmed symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection (COVID-19), hospitalisation, and admission to an intensive care unit (ICU) associated with COVID-19. We compared the risk of individuals treated with a complete primary immunization schedule (two doses, 28 days apart) with the risk of unvaccinated individuals during the follow-up period. The study was conducted in Chile from June 27, 2021, to January 12, 2022, when the SARS-CoV-2 Delta variant was predominant but other variants of concern were co-circulating, including Omicron. We used inverse probability-weighted survival regression models to estimate hazard ratios of complete immunization over the unvaccinated status, accounting for time-varying vaccination exposure and adjusting for relevant demographic, socioeconomic, and clinical confounders. Findings: The estimated adjusted vaccine effectiveness for the inactivated SARS-CoV-2 vaccine in children aged 6-16 years was 74.5% (95% CI, 73.8-75.2), 91.0% (95% CI, 87.8-93.4), 93.8% (95% CI, 87.8-93.4) for the prevention of COVID-19, hospitalisation, and ICU admission, respectively. For the subgroup of children 6-11 years, the vaccine effectiveness was 75.8% (95% CI, 74.7-76.8) for the prevention of COVID-19 and 77.9% (95% CI, 61.5-87.3) for the prevention of hospitalisation. Interpretation: Our results suggest that a complete primary immunization schedule with the inactivated SARS-CoV-2 vaccine provides effective protection against severe COVID-19 disease for children 6-16 years. Funding: Agencia Nacional de Investigación y Desarrollo (ANID) Millennium Science Initiative Program and Fondo de Financiamiento de Centros de Investigación en Áreas Prioritarias (FONDAP)Publication Antibiotic Consumption During the Coronavirus Disease 2019 Pandemic and Emergence of Carbapenemase-Producing Klebsiella pneumoniae Lineages Among Inpatients in a Chilean Hospital: A Time-Series Study and Phylogenomic Analysis(2023) Allel, Kasim; Peters, Anne Sophie; Conejeros, José; Martínez, José; Spencer, Maria; Riquelme, Roberto; Rivas Jiménez, Lina María; Rojas, Pamela; Orellana, Cristian; García, Patricia; Araos Bralic, Rafael Ignacio; McGovern, Olivia; Patel, Twisha; Arias, Cesar; Lessa, Fernanda; Undurraga, Eduardo; Munita, Jose M.Background: The impact of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) on antimicrobial use (AU) and resistance has not been well evaluated in South America. These data are critical to inform national policies and clinical care. Methods: At a tertiary hospital in Santiago, Chile, between 2018 and 2022, subdivided into pre- (3/2018-2/2020) and post-COVID-19 onset (3/2020-2/2022), we evaluated intravenous AU and frequency of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE). We grouped monthly AU (defined daily doses [DDD]/1000 patient-days) into broad-spectrum β-lactams, carbapenems, and colistin and used interrupted time-series analysis to compare AU during pre- and post-pandemic onset. We studied the frequency of carbapenemase-producing (CP) CRE and performed whole-genome sequencing analyses of all carbapenem-resistant (CR) Klebsiella pneumoniae (CRKpn) isolates collected during the study period. Results: Compared with pre-pandemic, AU (DDD/1000 patient-days) significantly increased after the pandemic onset, from 78.1 to 142.5 (P < .001), 50.9 to 110.1 (P < .001), and 4.1 to 13.3 (P < .001) for broad-spectrum β-lactams, carbapenems, and colistin, respectively. The frequency of CP-CRE increased from 12.8% pre-COVID-19 to 51.9% after pandemic onset (P < .001). The most frequent CRE species in both periods was CRKpn (79.5% and 76.5%, respectively). The expansion of CP-CRE harboring blaNDM was particularly noticeable, increasing from 40% (n = 4/10) before to 73.6% (n = 39/53) after pandemic onset (P < .001). Our phylogenomic analyses revealed the emergence of two distinct genomic lineages of CP-CRKpn: ST45, harboring blaNDM, and ST1161, which carried blaKPC. Conclusions: AU and the frequency of CP-CRE increased after COVID-19 onset. The increase in CP-CRKpn was driven by the emergence of novel genomic lineages. Our observations highlight the need to strengthen infection prevention and control and antimicrobial stewardship efforts.Publication Effectiveness of the second COVID-19 booster against Omicron: a large-scale cohort study in Chile(2023) Jara, Alejandro; Cuadrado, Cristobal; Undurraga, Eduardo; García , Christian; Nájera, Manuel; Bertoglia, María; Vergara, Verónica; Fernández , Jorge; García, Heriberto; Araos Bralic, Rafael IgnacioIn light of the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic and the emergence of new SARS-CoV-2 variants, understanding the effectiveness of various booster vaccination regimens is pivotal. In Chile, using a prospective national cohort of 3.75 million individuals aged 20 or older, we evaluate the effectiveness against COVID-19-related intensive care unit (ICU) admissions and death of mRNA-based second vaccine boosters for four different three-dose background regimes: BNT162b2 primary series followed by a homologous booster, and CoronaVac primary series followed by an mRNA booster, a homologous booster, and a ChAdOx-1 booster. We estimate the vaccine effectiveness weekly from February 14 to August 15, 2022, by determining hazard ratios of immunization over non-vaccination, accounting for relevant confounders. The overall adjusted effectiveness of a second mRNA booster shot is 88.2% (95%CI, 86.2-89.9) against ICU admissions and 90.5% (95%CI 89.4-91.4) against death. Vaccine effectiveness shows a mild decrease for all regimens and outcomes, probably linked to the introduction of BA.4 and BA.5 Omicron sub-lineages and the waning of immunity. Based on our findings, individuals might not need additional boosters for at least 6 months after receiving a second mRNA booster shot in this setting. A la luz de la actual pandemia de COVID-19 y la aparición de nuevas variantes del SARS-CoV-2, es fundamental comprender la eficacia de varios regímenes de vacunación de refuerzo. En Chile, utilizando una cohorte nacional prospectiva de 3,75 millones de personas de 20 años o más, evaluamos la efectividad contra las admisiones a unidades de cuidados intensivos (UCI) relacionadas con COVID-19 y la muerte de segundas dosis de refuerzo basadas en ARNm para cuatro dosis diferentes de tres dosis. regímenes: serie primaria BNT162b2 seguida de un refuerzo homólogo, y serie primaria CoronaVac seguida de un refuerzo de ARNm, un refuerzo homólogo y un refuerzo de ChAdOx-1. Estimamos la efectividad de la vacuna semanalmente del 14 de febrero al 15 de agosto de 2022, determinando los índices de riesgo de inmunización frente a no vacunación, teniendo en cuenta los factores de confusión relevantes. La eficacia global ajustada de una segunda inyección de refuerzo de ARNm es del 88,2% (IC del 95%, 86,2-89,9) frente a los ingresos en la UCI y del 90,5% (IC del 95%, 89,4-91,4) frente a la muerte. La eficacia de la vacuna muestra una leve disminución en todos los regímenes y resultados, probablemente relacionada con la introducción de los sublinajes Omicron BA.4 y BA.5 y la disminución de la inmunidad. Según nuestros hallazgos, es posible que las personas no necesiten refuerzos adicionales durante al menos 6 meses después de recibir una segunda inyección de refuerzo de ARNm en este entorno.