Person: Cabieses, Báltica
Loading...
Email Address
Birth Date
Research Projects
Organizational Units
Job Title
Last Name
Cabieses
First Name
Báltica
Name
3 results
¿Qué estás buscando?
Search Results
Now showing 1 - 3 of 3
Publication International migration, food insecurity, and mental health: A scoping review protocol(2024) Blukacz, Alice; Cabieses, Báltica; Huerta, Catalina; Lake, Amelia A.; Smith, Jo; Giles, Emma L.; Deane, FayeINTRODUCTION Food insecurity is a global priority that has been found to negatively impact mental health, increasing the risk of mental disorders and severe mental illness. International migrants may face food insecurity throughout their migratory cycle due to a range of risk factors, such as poor transit conditions, precarious employment, financial pressure, discrimination, and lack of availability and access to culturally relevant food, among others. Although there are multiple reviews on migration, food insecurity, and health in general, no scoping review has been conducted on food insecurity among international migrants focusing on mental health. OBJECTIVE To investigate the available evidence on food insecurity and mental health among international migrants. METHODS A search of scientific literature in English, Spanish, French, Italian, and Portuguese published since 2013 will be performed in the Web of Science, PubMed, Medline, APA PsycArticles, Cinahl, and ASSIA databases, including grey literature available in Google Scholar. Two authors will independently review titles, abstracts, and full texts before extracting data from publications complying with the eligibility criteria. Extracted data will be descriptively mapped according to emerging thematic categories. EXPECTED RESULTS The review will contribute to identifying what is known about international migration, food insecurity, and mental health, gaps in the literature, opportunities for specific research subtopics, and how food insecurity and mental health can be linked in the existing literature.Publication Effects of climate change on migration in Latin America and Caribbean: a scoping review(2024) Cabieses, Báltica; Huerta, CatalinaClimate change-induced natural disasters such as hurricanes, landslides, forest fires, and changes in precipitation directly affect rural sectors that depend on field production and other dimensions of everyday life. This generates the mobilization of people from their homes to safer places within the same country or across borders. There is a lack of information on the impacts of climate change on environmental migrants in Latin America and the Caribbean (LAC). This scoping review aims to describe the scientific evidence of the health effects of climate change on migrant in LAC. The review was conducted using databases from PubMed, Web of Science (WoS), and Google Scholar in English, Spanish and Portuguese. After screening the title, abstract, and full text of identified hits (n = 726), 31 records were finally included. Evidence indicates that climate change relates to health and healthcare, psychosocial and infrastructure dimensions among migrants in LAC. Health effects refer to limited access to healthcare, underdiagnosis, increased susceptibility to diseases and mental health conditions like stress and anxiety. Psychosocial dimensions refer to a heightened risk of sexual and gender-based violence, social marginalization, family separation, and loss of identity and culture. Infrastructure refers to environmental degradation and agricultural and urban infrastructure destruction. Multiple adaptations to these conditions are described among migrant populations in the region. Recommendations for improvements are presented. This scoping review suggests climate change’s significant health, psychosocial, and infrastructural associations with migrants in Latin America.Publication Determinants of COVID-19 and non-COVID-19 vaccine confidence in lowand middle-income countries: A systematic review of qualitative evidence and thematic synthesis(2025) Blukacz, Alice; Obach, Alexandra; Vasquez, Paola; Campaña, Carla; Huerta, Catalina; Bernal, Yanara; Cabieses, BálticaBackground: The COVID-19 pandemic has shown the immediate risk for global and public health posed by vaccination inequities worldwide. The regions most affected are low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). In addition to systemic challenges, vaccine hesitancy driven by low vaccine confidence has been identified as a threat to vaccine uptake. The aim of this systematic review of qualitative literature is to explore the determinants of COVID-19 and non-COVID-19 vaccine confidence in LMICs. Methods: A systematic review was conducted following the PRISMA and ENTREQ guidelines. The electronic databases Cinahl, Embase, Pubmed, Scopus and Web of Science were searched for qualitative studies focusing on the topic of interest in LMICs published between 2013 and 2023. The quality of the studies was assessed using the Joanna Briggs Institute's Checklist for Qualitative Research. A thematic synthesis was conducted. The study was registered on the Open Science Framework platform. Findings: 66 studies were included in the review. Three main determinants of vaccine confidence were identified: (1) General perceptions of the safety and efficacy of vaccines; (2) Information and experience; (3) Trust in healthcare providers, institutions, and systems. General perceptions of vaccine safety and efficacy were similar between COVID-19 and non-COVID-19 vaccines, and doubts regarding vaccine safety were neither new nor exclusive to the COVID-19 vaccine, indicating a persisting challenge. Furthermore, low vaccine confidence was partly determined by broader dynamics of mistrust towards Western countries and institutions, which was reflected for both vaccine groups. While conspiracy theories have been persisting determinants of low confidence, low COVID-19 vaccine confidence was partly determined by what was perceived as a lack of specific information. Conclusion: Persistent challenges to vaccine confidence were identified, rooted in colonial legacies and global health inequities, as well as limited intercultural approaches to building trust with regards to vaccines.