Browsing by Author "Yakob, Laith"
Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
Results Per Page
Sort Options
Publication Cost-effectiveness of screening, decolonisation and isolation strategies for carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infections in hospitals: a sex-stratified mathematical modelling study(2025) Allel, Kasim; Garcia, Patricia; Peters, Anne; Munita, José; Undurraga, Eduardo A.; Yakob, LaithBackground Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE)impose the greatest burden among critical bacterial pathogens. Evidence for sex differences among antibiotic resistant bacterial infections is increasing but a focus on policy implications is needed. We assessed impact of CRE/MRSA on excess length of hospital stay, intensive care unit admission, and mortality by sex from a retrospective cohort study (n = 873) of patients in three Chilean hospitals, 2018–2021. Methods We used inverse-probability weighting combined with descriptive, logistic, and competing-risks analyses. We developed a sex-stratified deterministic compartmental model to analyse hospital transmission dynamics and the cost-effectiveness of nine interventions. We compared interventions based on the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gained and estimated net benefits. Findings The adjusted odds of women acquiring CRE and MRSA were 0.44 (0.28–0.70; p = 0.0013) and 0.73 (95% CI = 0.48–1.01; p = 0.050), respectively. Competing-risk models indicated higher mortality rates among women, compared to men. Mathematical model projections showed that pre-emptive isolation across all newly admitted high-risk men was the most cost-effective intervention (ICER = $1366/QALY and $1083/QALY for CRE and MRSA, respectively). Chromogenic agar coupled with MRSA decolonisation was the second most cost-effective intervention ($2099/QALY), followed by screening plus isolation or pre-emptive isolation strategies (ICER ranged between $2411/QALY and $4216/QALY across CRE and MRSA models). Probabilistic sensitivity analysis showed that strategies were ICER < willingness-to-pay in 80% of simulations, except for testing plus digestive decolonisation for CRE. At a 20% national hospital coverage at least $12.2 million could be saved. Interpretation Our model suggests that targeted infection control strategies would effectively address rising CRE and MRSA infections. Maximising health-economic gains may be achieved by focusing on control measures for men as primary drivers for transmission, thereby reducing the disproportionate disease burden borne by women.Publication Excess burden of antibiotic-resistant bloodstream infections: evidence from a multicentre retrospective cohort study in Chile, 2018–2022(2024) Allel, Kasim; Peters, Anne Sophie; Haghparast-Bidgoli, Hassan; Spencer-Sandino, Maria; Conejeros, Jose; Garcia, Patricia; Pouwels, Koen B.; Yakob, Laith; Munita, Jose M.; Undurraga, Eduardo A.Background Antibiotic-resistant bloodstream infections (ARB BSI) cause an enormous disease and economic burden. We assessed the impact of ARB BSI caused by high- and critical-priority pathogens in hospitalised Chilean patients compared to BSI caused by susceptible bacteria. Methods We conducted a retrospective cohort study from 2018 to 2022 in three Chilean hospitals and measured the association of ARB BSI with in-hospital mortality, length of hospitalisation (LOS), and intensive care unit (ICU) admission. We focused on BSI caused by Acinetobacter baumannii, Enterobacterales, Staphylococcus aureus, Enterococcus species, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. We addressed confounding using propensity scores, inverse probability weighting, and multivariate regressions. We stratified by community- and hospital-acquired BSI and assessed total hospital and productivity costs. Findings We studied 1218 adult patients experiencing 1349 BSI episodes, with 47.3% attributed to ARB. Predominant pathogens were Staphylococcus aureus (33% Methicillin-resistant ‘MRSA’), Enterobacterales (50% Carbapenem-resistant ‘CRE’), and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (65% Carbapenem-resistant ‘CRPA’). Approximately 80% of BSI were hospital-acquired. ARB was associated with extended LOS (incidence risk ratio IRR = 1.14, 95% CI = 1.05–1.24), increased ICU admissions (odds ratio OR = 1.25; 1.07–1.46), and higher mortality (OR = 1.42, 1.20–1.68) following index blood culture across all BSI episodes. In-hospital mortality risk, adjusted for time-varying and fixed confounders, was 1.35-fold higher (1.16–1.58) for ARB patients, with higher hazard ratios for hospital-acquired MRSA and CRE at 1.37 and 1.48, respectively. Using a societal perspective and a 5% discount rate, we estimated excess costs for ARB at $12,600 per patient, with an estimated annual excess burden of 2270 disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) and $9.6 (5.0–16.4) million. Interpretation It is urgent to develop and implement interventions to reduce the burden of ARB BSIs, particularly from MRSA and CRE.