Browsing by Author "Schnake, Klaus"

Now showing 1 - 3 of 3
  • Thumbnail Image
    Publication
    AO Spine-DGOU Osteoporotic Fracture Classification System: Internal Validation by the AO Spine Knowledge Forum Trauma
    (2024) Scherer, Julian; Joaquim, Andrei; Vaccaro, Alex; Kanna, Rishi; El-Sharkawi, Mohammad; Takahata, Masahiko; Aly, Mohamed; Camino, Gaston; Spiegl, Ulrich; Oner, Cumhur; Canseco, Jose; Yurac, Ratko; Benneker, Lorin; Popescu, Eugen; Bransford, Richard; Chhabra, Harvinder; Kandziora, Frank; Neva, Marko; Schnake, Klaus
    Study design: Cross-sectional survey. Objectives: Injury classifications are important tools to identify fracture patterns, guide treatment-decisions and aid to identify optimal treatment plans. The AO Spine-DGOU Osteoporotic Fracture (OF) classification system was developed, and the aim of this study was to assess the reliability of this new classification system. Methods: 23 Members of the AO Spine Knowledge Forum Trauma participated in the validation process. Participants were asked to rate 33 cases according to the OF classification at 2 time points, 4 weeks apart (assessment 1 and 2). The kappa statistic (κ) was calculated to assess inter-observer reliability and intra-rater reproducibility. The gold master key for each case was determined by approval of at least 5 out of 7 members of the DGOU. Results: A total of 1386 ratings (21 raters) were performed. The overall inter-rater agreement was moderate with a combined kappa statistic for the OF classification of 0.496 in assessment 1 and 0.482 in assessment 2. The combined percentage of correct ratings (compared to gold-standard) in assessment 1 was 71.4% and 67.4% in assessment 2. The average intra-rater reproducibility was substantial (κ = 0.74, median 0.76, range 0.55 to 1.00, SD 0.13) for the assessed fracture types. Conclusions: The assessed overall inter-rater reliability was moderate and substantial in some instances. The average intra-rater reproducibility is substantial. It seems that appropriate training of the classification system can enhance inter- and intra-rater reliability.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Publication
    Streamlining the Journey of Research Into Clinical Practice: Making Your Patients and Practice Flourish Optimizing Management and Minimizing Risk of Osteoporotic Vertebral Fractures - Perspectives of the AO Spine KF Trauma and Infection Group Key Opinion Leaders
    (2024) Joaquim, Andrei; Bigdon, Sebastian; Bransford, Richard; Chhabra, Harvinder; Yurac, Ratko; Kumar, Vishal; El-Sharkawi, Mohammad; Benneker, Lorin; Karamian, Brian; Canseco, Jose; Scherer, Julian; Hassan, Ahmed; Schroeder, Gregory; Öner, Cumhur; Rajasekaran, Shanmuganathan; Vialle, Emiliano; Kanna, Rishi; Vaccaro, Alexander; Tee, Jin; Camino, Gaston; Fisher, Charles; Dvorak, Marcel; Schnake, Klaus; AO Spine Knowledge Forum Trauma & Infection
    Study design: Literature review with clinical recommendations. Objective: To highlight important studies about osteoporotic spinal fractures (OF) that may be integrated into clinical practice based on the assessment of the AO Spine KF Trauma and Infection group key opinion leaders. Methods: 4 important studies about OF that may affect current clinical practice of spinal surgeons were selected and reviewed with the aim of providing clinical recommendations to streamline the journey of research into clinical practice. Recommendations were graded as strong or conditional following the GRADE methodology. Results: 4 studies were selected. Article 1: a validation of the Osteoporotic Fracture (OF)-score to treat OF fractures. Conditional recommendation to incorporate the OF score in the management of fractures to improve clinical results. Article 2: a randomized multicenter study comparing romosozumab/alendronate vs alendronate to decrease the incidence of new vertebral fractures. Strong recommendation that the group receiving romosozumab/alendronate had a decreased risk of new OF when compared with the alendronate only group only. Article 3: a systematic literature review of spinal orthoses in the management of. Conditional recommendation to prescribe a spinal orthosis to decrease pain and improve quality of life. Article 4: post-traumatic deformity after OF. A conditional recommendation that middle column injury and pre-injury use of steroids may lead to high risk of post-traumatic deformity after OF. Conclusions: Management of patients with OF is still complex and challenging. This review provides some recommendations that may help surgeons to better manage these patients and improve their clinical practice.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Publication
    Treatment of unilateral cervical facet fractures without evidence of dislocation or subluxation: a narrative review and proposed treatment algorithm
    (2024) Cirillo, Juan; Ricciardi, Guillermo; Alvarez, Facundo; Guiroy, Alfredo; Yurac, Ratko; Schnake, Klaus
    Isolated cervical spine facet fractures are often overlooked. The primary imaging modality for diagnosing these injuries is a computed tomography scan. Treatment of unilateral cervical facet fractures without evidence of dislocation or subluxation remains controversial. The available evidence regarding treatment options for these fractures is of low quality. Risk factors associated with the failure of nonoperative treatment are: comminution of the articular mass or facet joint, acute radiculopathy, high body mass index, listhesis exceeding 2 mm, fragmental diastasis, acute disc injury, and bilateral fractures or fractures that adversely affect 40% of the intact lateral mass height or have an absolute height of 1 cm.

Implementado por OpenGeek Services