Browsing by Author "Rius, Montserrat"
Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
Results Per Page
Sort Options
Publication Cryopreserved Total Skin Allografts From Living Donors for Complex Wound Management: A New Paradigm in Regenerative Wound Care(2025) Fonseca, Marcelo; Cañete, Aldo; Mandriaza, Luana; Gómez, Jennifer; Masiá, Jaume; Marcelain, Katherine; Ibaceta, Dino; Erazo, Cristian; Gámez, Brenda; Rius, Montserrat; Disi, FlorenciaSkin allografts are essential in managing complex wounds, yet their availability is limited by low post-mortem donation rates. Skin harvested during body contouring surgeries offers a novel and sustainable source to expand tissue supply. We conducted a retrospective descriptive study at the Tarapacá Skin and Tissue Bank from January 2022 to December 2024. All donations from body contouring surgeries were processed as cryopreserved total skin allografts following national tissue banking stand- ards. Variables included donor demographics, harvested area, units produced, microbiological results, and discard rates. To describe clinical performance, we present our group's initial clinical series of treated patients. From 248 living donors (mean age 41.3 years), 81 293 cm2 of skin generated 2050 units. The discard rate was 27%, mainly due to a storage failure and isolated micro- bial contamination. Clinically, all patients achieved complete initial graft take, followed by gradual necrotic eschar formation at an average of 21 days. Eschar removal revealed vital tissue firmly adhered to the recipient bed, rich in fibroblasts and neovascu- lar structures. Subsequent management included either escharectomy with split-thickness autografting over the neodermis, or spontaneous eschar lysis and skin regeneration, with the graft functioning as a dermal regenerator. This model increases tissue availability while providing allografts with both coverage and dermal regenerative properties.Item Prioritization for liver transplantation using the MELD score in Chile: Inequities generated by MELD exceptions.: A collaboration between the Chilean Liver Transplant Programs, the Public Health Institute and the National Transplant Coordinator(2019) Díaz, Luis; Norero, Blanca; Lara, Bárbara; Robles, Camila; Elgueta, Susana; Humeres, Roberto; Poniachik, Jaime; Silva, Guillermo; Wolff, Rodrigo; Innocenti, Franco; Rojas, José; Zapata, Rodrigo; Hunter, Bessie; Álvarez, Sergio; Cancino, Alejandra; Ibarra, José; Rius, Montserrat; González, Sandra; Calabrán, Lorena; Pérez, RosaIntroduction and aim: The MELD score has been established as an efficient and rigorous prioritization system for liver transplant (LT). Our study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of the MELD score as a system for prioritization for LT, in terms of decreasing the dropout rate in the waiting list and maintaining an adequate survival post-LT in Chile. Materials and methods: We analyzed the Chilean Public Health Institute liver transplant registry of candidates listed from October 15th 2011 to December 31st 2014. We included adult candidates (>15 years old) listed for elective cadaveric LT with a MELD score of 15 or higher. Statistical analysis included survival curves (Kaplan-Meier), log-rank statistics and multivariate logistic regression. Results: 420 candidates were analyzed. Mean age was 53.6±11.8 years, and 244 were men (58%). Causes of LT included: Liver cirrhosis without exceptions (HC) 177 (66.4%); hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) 111 (26.4%); cirrhosis with non-HCC exceptions 102 (24.3%) and non-cirrhotic candidates 30 (7.2%). LT rate was 43.2%. The dropout rate was 37.6% at 1-year. Even though the LT rate was higher, the annual dropout rate was significantly higher in cirrhotic candidates (without exceptions) compared with cirrhotics with HCC, and non-HCC exceptions plus non-cirrhotic candidates (47.9%; 37.2% and 24.2%, respectively, with p=0.004). Post-LT survival was 84% per year, with no significant differences between the three groups (p=0.95). Conclusion: Prioritization for LT using the MELD score system has not decreased the dropout rate in Chile (persistent low donor's rate). Exceptions generate inequities in dropout rate, disadvantaging patients without exceptions.