Browsing by Author "Poulsen, Gianella"
Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
Results Per Page
Sort Options
Item Estudio Exploratorio sobre los Recursos de las Personas en Psicoterapia desde la Perspectiva de los Psicoterapeutas(2010) Villanueva, Luis Tapia; Poulsen, Gianella; Armijo, Iván; Pereira, Ximena; Sotomayor, PatriciaEl estudio pretende delimitar el concepto de recurso, identificar sus tipos y usos en psicoterapia desde la perspectiva de psicoterapeutas expertos. Se aplicaron tres metodologías: Grupo Tareas: Discusión sistemática de 5 psicoterapeutas expertos. Grupo Delphi: Cuestionarios iterativos a trece psicoterapeutas expertos. Grupo Experiencial: Metodología experiencial en 29 psicoterapeutas. Resultados: Grupo Tareas: Distinguió recursos del paciente, del terapeuta, del sistema terapéutico y del contexto. Grupo Delphi: Sistematiza su definición, identificación y operacionalización. Grupo Experiencial: Identifica diferentes dimensiones de la experiencia. Se concluye que los terapeutas conceptualizan los recursos como procesos emergentes, definidos como una co-construcción relacional. El recurso y la carencia son considerados como dimensiones complementarias, donde el recurso no es un estado dado sino orientado a la búsqueda del bienestar en el contexto psicoterapéutico.Item Factors Preventing Gridlock in Chilean Couples Relationships Based on the Discourse of Couples Therapists and Highly Adjusted Couples(2014) Tapia Villanueva, Luis; Molina, María Elisa; Aspillaga H., Carolina; Cruzat Mandich, Claudia; Pereira, Ximena; Poulsen, Gianella; Sotomayor, Patricia; Armijo, IvánThe term gridlock describes the occurrence of rigid patterns in couples' conflict. This study aimed to describe strategies of conflict resolution and gridlock prevention from the perspectives of couples and couple therapists. Participants were couple therapists and highly adjusted couples scored by the dyadic adjustment scale (DAS), distributed according to traditional and non-traditional position in life and duration of relationships. Conflict gridlock scenarios were used to create video stimulus that were presented to participants. A qualitative methodology was used to analyse couples' and therapists' commentaries on the scenarios. Results showed differences in preventing conflict gridlock among sub-groups of couples. Long-term traditional couples focused on loyalty to a common project and value sacrificing to a higher good; long-term non-traditional couples prioritised caring and validating the bond in the relationship. Short-term traditional couples focused on mutual love and the relief of hurt while short-term non-traditional couples supported the value of equity.