Browsing by Author "Paccot, Daniel"
Now showing 1 - 6 of 6
Results Per Page
Sort Options
Item Análisis comparativo de tres modelos de prótesis reversa de hombro basados en los nuevos ángulos de distalización y lateralización(2021) Bernal, Nora; Paccot, Daniel; Reinares, Felipe; Franz, PaterComparar resultados funcionales e imagenológicos de tres modelos protésicos según el índice de lateralización y distalización. En un grupo heterogéneo de diagnósticos (fractura, artropatía de manguito, secuela de fractura y artrosis glenohumeral). Material y métodos: Cohorte prospectiva de 33 pacientes sometidos a prótesis reversa de hombro entre Diciembre 2014 y Julio 2017 con un seguimiento mínimo de un año. Se definieron tres grupos, G: 10 pacientes con Grammont clásico (155o, Glena medializada); B: nueve pacientes con Bio-RSA (155o, glena lateralizada ósea); y A: 14 con Arrow (135o, glena lateralizada metálica). Las variables fueron: datos demográficos, clínicos, funcionales y radiológicos (ángulo de lateralización y distalización). Para el análisis estadístico se utilizaron pruebas de ANOVA, T-test y regresión lineal, con una significancia estadística de 5%. Resultados: El ángulo de lateralización del hombro (LSA) fue significativamente mayor en el grupo A (98o A, 79oG, 80o B) (p < 0.05). El ángulo de distalización del hombro (DSA) del grupo B fue significativamente superior al A (52o B, 39o A) (p < 0.05) y no significativamente superior al G (48o G) (p = 0.06). No se demostró una correlación entre el LSA y DSA con la rotación externa (p = 0.51) y elevación activa (p = 0.41), respectivamente. En índices clínicos (elevación anterior, rotación externa, rotación interna) y funcionales (índice Constant ajustado y evaluación subjetiva de hombro) no encontramos diferencias significativas entre los distintos modelos protésicos (p > 0.05). Conclusiones: El ángulo de lateralización fue mayor en el modelo Arrow y distalización en el modelo Bio-RSA. No encontramos correlación clínica-radiológica en esta serie heterogénea de pacientes.Item Arthroscopy-Assisted Latissimus Dorsi Transfer for Irreparable Subscapularis Tears(2021) Reinares, Felipe; Calvo, Andrés; Reyes, José; Moreno, José; Paccot, DanielIrreparable tears of the subscapularis (SS) tendon are difficult to manage and represent a challenge for the surgeon, especially in young and active patients. They are associated with a horizontal imbalance of the shoulder, causing pain and limitation of active internal rotation. Historically, the alternative for these patients has been transfer of the pectoralis major, with all its variations, total or partial, up or under the conjoint tendon. However, this transfer has mechanical disadvantages, especially related to the vector of traction, because it originates in the anterior region of the chest. In 2013, Elhassan and colleagues demonstrated in cadavers the technical feasibility and neurological safety of performing transfers of the latissimus dorsi (LD) to the lesser tuberosity to reconstruct irreparable lesions of the subscapularis. This option, compared with alternatives, has superior biomechanical advantages such as a similar vector of traction, originating from lower and posterior to the thorax, in addition to involving a synergistic muscle in action. In early 2016, Kany and colleagues first published a study of 5 patients undergoing arthroscopic assisted LD to SS transfer, with promising results. Our purpose is to present an arthroscopically assisted latissimus dorsi transfer technique in patients with irreparable subscapularis rupture.Item Clinical and arthrometric outcomes of an anatomic outside-in single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using a retrodrill(Elsevier, 2016) Figueroa, David; Calvo, Rafael; Figueroa, Francisco; Paccot, Daniel; Izquierdo, Guillermo; Morales, NelsonBACKGROUND: The main option to perform an anatomic anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction is the anteromedial portal (AMP) technique. It has several reported complications (iatrogenic chondral injury, posterior-wall blowout, short sockets, increased risk of injury to common peroneal nerve). In an attempt to avoid these complications the outside-in (OI) technique was revived with the addition of a retrodrill. The aim of this study is to evaluate the clinical and arthrometric outcomes of a series of anatomical OI single bundle ACL reconstruction using a retrodrill. METHODS: Prospective case series. KT-1000 and Pivot Shift Test were done at 24 months follow-up. International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC), Lysholm and Tegner activity scores preoperatively and at final follow-up. Complications were reported. Statistical analysis was done with t-test. RESULTS: 275 knees of 200 (73%) males and 75 (27%) females were enrolled in the study. Mean age 29.1 years (15-54). Mean follow-up 34.5 months (24-49). Mean preoperatively Lysholm Score 62 (25-95) versus 95 (76-100) at final follow-up (p<0.001) Mean preoperatively IKDC score 60 (26.4-90.8) versus 92 (59.8-100) at final follow-up (p<0.001) Mean Tegner activity Score pre injury 5 versus 5 at final follow-up. (p=0.59) Mean KT-1000 side-to-side difference 2mm (1-6). Pivot Shift test negative in 243 patients (90%); positive in 32 (10%) patients. 13 (5%) ACL re-ruptures. 2 (0.7%) infections. No other complications were reported. CONCLUSION: OI single bundle anatomic ACL reconstruction using a retrodrill is a valid and safe option that avoids the complications reported with the AMP technique.Item Hip arthroscopy and osteoarthritis: Where are the limits and indications?(2015) Mella, Claudio; Villalón, Ignacio E; Núñez, Álvaro; Paccot, Daniel; Díaz-Ledezma, ClaudioThe use of hip arthroscopy, as a surgical technique, has increased significantly over the past ten years.The procedure has shown good and excellent results in symptom relief and function improvement for patients withfemoro-acetabular impingement (FAI) and concurrent chondro-labral lesions. It is also a reliable method to correct the characteristic pathomorphologic alteration of FAI. However, surgical results are less successful among patients with advanced articular damage and secondary hip osteoarthritis. The aim of this article is to present some clinical and imagenological tools to discriminate the good candidates for arthroscopic FAI treatment from those who are not, due to extensive articular damage.Item Results of standardized treatment of elbow fracture dislocations as per their injury pattern: a retrospective cohort of 89 patients(2021) Reinares, Felipe; Rojas, Nicolás; Calvo, Andrés; Aravena, Cristian; Rieutord, Juan Pablo; Callejas, Orlando; Montegu, Roberto; Paccot, DanielBackground: Elbow fracture dislocations represent difficult injuries to treat, with a high percentage ofcomplications. Classically, they are divided into posterolateral, posteromedial and transulnar pattern. It isessential to distinguish them to guide intraoperative treatment to achieve an anatomic and stablereduction that allows early mobility. Methods: A retrospective study of 89 adult patients diagnosed with elbow fracture dislocations whounderwent a standardized surgery between 2013 and 2018 with a minimum follow-up of 12 months. Demographic data, characteristics of the injury, and associated procedures were collected. Patients wereevaluated with functional scores (Mayo elbow performance score/Broberg and Morrey score) and ranges of movement at the end of the follow-up. Results: The mean age was 41 ± 12 years, mostly men (82%), with an average follow-up of 29 months. We present 42 patients with posterolateral fracture dislocation (47%), 21 posteromedial (24%) and 26 transulnar (29%). The average range of motion at the end of follow-up was 12 ± 11 extension, 124 ± 20 flexion, 76 ± 16 pronation, and 73 ± 20 supination, with a Mayo elbow performance score of 88.7 ± 12 points and 87.2 ± 12 points in the Broberg and Morrey scale. Reoperation rate was 23%, with no infection or heterotopic ossification cases. Transulnar fracture dislocations have significantly worse extension and supination. As per the functional result (Mayo elbow performance score/Broberg and Morrey scale), there are no significant differences between the different patterns. Conclusion: Proper injury pattern recognition and a standardized surgical management lead to a stable joint and good results in range of motion. Functional results are encouraging at least at short term, despite the high reoperations rate.Item Transferencia artroscópica del trapecio inferior en pacientes con rotura irreparable del manguito rotador posterosuperior. Resultados preliminares de ocho pacientes(2021) Calvo, Andrés; Lecaros, Juan José; Rojas, Nicolás; Paccot, Daniel; Toro Saelzer, Felipe; Reinares, FelipeIntroduction: the purpose of this study is to compare clinical and functional outcomes of patients with irreparable posterosuperiorrotator cuff tears treated by arthroscopic assisted lower trapezius transfer. Materials and methods: retrospective cohort design of patients with irreparable rotator cuff tear, treated by arthroscopy-assisted lower trapezius transfer. The clinical evolution was evaluated according to the gain in the range of shoulder movement and the decrease of pain. Functional outcomes were evaluated using the Constant-Murley score and the subjective shoulder value (SSV). Results: eight patients were included, with average follow-up of twenty-two months. We obtained a statistically significant gain in active external rotation of 32°, 5-point decrease in the pain scale (VAS), a 31-point increase in the Constant score, and a 38% increase in SSV. There was a 12° increase in active forward elevation, however this was not statistically significant. Two patients had a seroma at the trapezius harvest site, which resolved with conservative treatment. Conclusion: arthroscopically assisted lower trapezius transfer in patients with irreparable posterosuperior rotator cuff tears were a safe technique that significantly improves external rotation and functional scores in patients. Type of study: Case series (IV