Browsing by Author "Morales, Nelson"

Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Clinical and arthrometric outcomes of an anatomic outside-in single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using a retrodrill
    (Elsevier, 2016) Figueroa, David; Calvo, Rafael; Figueroa, Francisco; Paccot, Daniel; Izquierdo, Guillermo; Morales, Nelson
    BACKGROUND: The main option to perform an anatomic anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction is the anteromedial portal (AMP) technique. It has several reported complications (iatrogenic chondral injury, posterior-wall blowout, short sockets, increased risk of injury to common peroneal nerve). In an attempt to avoid these complications the outside-in (OI) technique was revived with the addition of a retrodrill. The aim of this study is to evaluate the clinical and arthrometric outcomes of a series of anatomical OI single bundle ACL reconstruction using a retrodrill. METHODS: Prospective case series. KT-1000 and Pivot Shift Test were done at 24 months follow-up. International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC), Lysholm and Tegner activity scores preoperatively and at final follow-up. Complications were reported. Statistical analysis was done with t-test. RESULTS: 275 knees of 200 (73%) males and 75 (27%) females were enrolled in the study. Mean age 29.1 years (15-54). Mean follow-up 34.5 months (24-49). Mean preoperatively Lysholm Score 62 (25-95) versus 95 (76-100) at final follow-up (p<0.001) Mean preoperatively IKDC score 60 (26.4-90.8) versus 92 (59.8-100) at final follow-up (p<0.001) Mean Tegner activity Score pre injury 5 versus 5 at final follow-up. (p=0.59) Mean KT-1000 side-to-side difference 2mm (1-6). Pivot Shift test negative in 243 patients (90%); positive in 32 (10%) patients. 13 (5%) ACL re-ruptures. 2 (0.7%) infections. No other complications were reported. CONCLUSION: OI single bundle anatomic ACL reconstruction using a retrodrill is a valid and safe option that avoids the complications reported with the AMP technique.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Five-strand hamstring autograft versus quadruple hamstring autograft with graft diameters 8.0 millimeters or more in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: clinical outcomes with a minimum 2-year follow-up
    (Elsevier, 2017) Calvo, Rafael; Figueroa, David; Figueroa, Francisco; Vaisman, Alex; Schmidt-Hebbel, Andres; Morales, Nelson; Izquierdo, Guillermo
    PURPOSE: To compare the outcomes of 2 groups of patients undergoing anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction: the first with a quadrupled semitendinosus gracilis (ST-G) autograft larger than 8 mm diameter and the second with a 5-strand ST-G autograft larger than 8 mm due to an insufficient diameter graft harvesting. METHODS: This was a retrospective study with 70 patients divided into 2 groups. Inclusion criteria included ACL ruptures of less than 3 months, ST-G ACL reconstructions, and final (4-strand or 5-strand) graft size larger than 8 mm. Exclusion criteria included multiligament knee injuries, meniscal or chondral pathology, ACL re-ruptures, inflammatory joint disease, or other procedures in the knee. RESULTS: Group A comprised 33 patients with a quadruple ST-G graft, and group B comprised 37 patients with an insufficient graft diameter (<8 mm) in which a 5-strand graft was used. Mean age in group A was 29.7 (range 17-52) years and in group B was 30.6 (range 13-53) years (P = .78). Average follow-up in group A was 32.2 (range 24-48) months and in group B was 30.35 (range 24-48) months (P = .75). Average graft diameter in group A was 8.5 mm (range 8-10) and in group B when the graft was measured as quadruple was 7.2 mm (range 6.5-7.5) and 9.2 mm (range 8-10) when it was converted to 5-strand (P = .00596). Group A had 3 (9%) re-ruptures, and group B had 2 (5.4%) (P = .55). The average postoperative Lysholm score in group A was 93.3 (range 71-100) and in group B was 97.1 (range 80-100) (P = .79). Mean postoperative International Knee Documentation Committee in group A was 91 (range 75.9-100) and in group B was 96.8 (range 82-100) (P = .18). CONCLUSIONS: In our study, the 5-strand hamstring autograft in ACL reconstruction was clinically comparable with the quadruple autograft larger than 8 mm. The differences in re-rupture and clinical outcomes were not statistically significant between the 2 groups, suggesting that it is a valid option when we have a graft of insufficient diameter. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, retrospective comparative study.

Implementado por OpenGeek Services