Browsing by Author "Montoya, Jorge"
Now showing 1 - 3 of 3
Results Per Page
Sort Options
Publication Cardiac function in critically ill patients with severe COVID: A prospective cross-sectional study in mechanically ventilated patients(2022) Valenzuela, Emilio Daniel; Mercado, Pablo; Pairumani, Ronald; Medel, Juan Nicolás; Petruska, Edward; Ugalde, Diego; Morales, Felipe; Eisen, Daniela; Araya, Carla; Montoya, Jorge; González, Alejandra; Rovegno, Maximiliano; Ramirez, Javier; Aguilera, Javiera; Hernández, Glenn; Bruhn, Alejandro; Slama, Michel; Bakker, JanPurpose: To evaluate cardiac function in mechanically ventilated patients with COVID-19. Materials and methods: Prospective, cross-sectional multicenter study in four university-affiliated hospitals in Chile. All consecutive patients with COVID-19 ARDS requiring mechanical ventilation admitted between April and July 2020 were included. We performed systematic transthoracic echocardiography assessing right and left ventricular function within 24 h of intubation. Results: 140 patients aged 57 ± 11, 29% female were included. Cardiac output was 5.1 L/min [IQR 4.5-6.2] and 86% of the patients required norepinephrine. ICU mortality was 29% (40 patients). Fifty-four patients (39%) exhibited right ventricle dilation out of whom 20 patients (14%) exhibited acute cor pulmonale (ACP). Eight out of the twenty patients with ACP exhibited pulmonary embolism (40%). Thirteen patients (9%) exhibited left ventricular systolic dysfunction (ejection fraction <45%). In the multivariate analysis acute cor pulmonale and PaO2/FiO2 ratio were independent predictors of ICU mortality. Conclusions: Right ventricular dilation is highly prevalent in mechanically ventilated patients with COVID-19 ARDS. Acute cor pulmonale was associated with reduced pulmonary function and, in only 40% of patients, with co-existing pulmonary embolism. Acute cor pulmonale is an independent risk factor for ICU mortality.Publication Continuous prolonged prone positioning in COVID‑19‑related ARDS: a multicenter cohort study from Chile(2022) Cornejo, Rodrigo; Montoya, Jorge; Gajardo, Abraham; Graf, Jerónimo; Alegría, Leyla; Baghetti, Romyna; Irarrázaval, Anita; Santis, César; Pavez, Nicolás; Leighton, Sofía; Tomicic, Vinko; Morales, Daniel; Ruiz, Carolina; Navarrete, Pablo; Vargas, Patricio; Gálvez, Roberto; Espinosa, Victoria; Lazo, Marioli; Pérez Araos, Rodrigo; Garay, Osvaldo; Sepúlveda, Patrick; Martínez, Edgardo; Bruhn, Alejandro; SOCHIMI Prone-COVID-19 GroupBackground: Prone positioning is currently applied in time-limited daily sessions up to 24 h which determines that most patients require several sessions. Although longer prone sessions have been reported, there is scarce evidence about the feasibility and safety of such approach. We analyzed feasibility and safety of a continuous prolonged prone positioning strategy implemented nationwide, in a large cohort of COVID-19 patients in Chile. Methods: Retrospective cohort study of mechanically ventilated COVID-19 patients with moderate-to-severe acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), conducted in 15 Intensive Care Units, which adhered to a national protocol of continuous prone sessions ≥ 48 h and until PaO2:FiO2 increased above 200 mm Hg. The number and extension of prone sessions were registered, along with relevant physiologic data and adverse events related to prone positioning. The cohort was stratified according to the first prone session duration: Group A, 2-3 days; Group B, 4-5 days; and Group C, > 5 days. Multivariable regression analyses were performed to assess whether the duration of prone sessions could impact safety. Results: We included 417 patients who required a first prone session of 4 (3-5) days, of whom 318 (76.3%) received only one session. During the first prone session the main adverse event was grade 1-2 pressure sores in 97 (23.9%) patients; severe adverse events were infrequent with 17 non-scheduled extubations (4.2%). 90-day mortality was 36.2%. Ninety-eight patients (24%) were classified as group C; they exhibited a more severe ARDS at baseline, as reflected by lower PaO2:FiO2 ratio and higher ventilatory ratio, and had a higher rate of pressure sores (44%) and higher 90-day mortality (48%). However, after adjustment for severity and several relevant confounders, prone session duration was not associated with mortality or pressure sores. Conclusions: Nationwide implementation of a continuous prolonged prone positioning strategy for COVID-19 ARDS patients was feasible. Minor pressure sores were frequent but within the ranges previously described, while severe adverse events were infrequent. The duration of prone session did not have an adverse effect on safety.Publication Critical care echocardiography in prone position patients during COVID‑19 pandemic: a feasibility study(2022) Ugalde, Diego; Medel, Juan; Mercado, Pablo; Pairumani, Ronald; Eisen, Daniela; Petruska, Edward; Montoya, Jorge; Morales, Felipe; Araya, Carla; Valenzuela, EmilioPurpose: Critical care echocardiography is a fundamental tool in the hemodynamic evaluation of critically ill patients and prone position ventilation might limit its application. We aim to evaluate the feasibility of transthoracic echocardiography to assess different measurements performed in prone vs supine position in patients during COVID-19 pandemic to answer our research question: What is the feasibility of classic echocardiographic measurements in COVID-19 patients in prone position ventilation? Methods: Patients with covid-19 admitted to ICUs in four academic hospitals with respiratory failure and on mechanical ventilation were evaluated with critical care echocardiography. The first ultrasound assessment was compared between prone and supine patients recording feasibility of several echocardiographic measurements, using Fisher's exact test complementing with Crombach's Alpha. Results: 139 patients were included. Sixty-eight (49%) were evaluated in prone position and seventy one (51%) in supine position. Most variables were highly feasible, left ventricular volumes and ejection fraction were more possible to obtain in prone position, while cardiac output was in supine position. Tricuspid regurgitation was the least feasible overall measurement. Conclusion: Prone position ultrasound achieved a high feasibility of measurements compared with supine ultrasound in critically ill patients with COVID-19 respiratory failure and on mechanical ventilation. Registration: Post hoc analysis of Echo-COVID study (NTC04628195, registered November 13, 2020, retrospectively registered).