Browsing by Author "Jimenez, Carlos A."
Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
Results Per Page
Sort Options
Publication Additive Value of EBUS-TBNA for Staging Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer in Patients Evaluated for Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy(2025) Boster, Joshua M.; Goertzen, S. Michael; Sainz, Paula V.; Rodríguez Vial, Macarena; Zaveri-Desai, Jhankruti K.; Luna, Luis D.; Grosu, Horiana B.; Waqar, Anum; Casal, Roberto F.; Jimenez, Carlos A.; Ost, David E.; Sabath, Bruce F.; Lin, Julie; Hernandez, Mike; Eapen, Georgie A.Background/Objectives: Patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) being evaluated for stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) are frequently staged non-invasively with positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT). Performing endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) in addition to PET/CT scanning may increase clinical certainty in lymph node staging, but the magnitude of added benefit of EBUS-TBNA over non-invasive staging methods is unclear. Methods: A single-center prospective cohort study involving patients with suspected or confirmed Stage I or IIa NSCLC referred for EBUS-TBNA prior to SBRT was performed. The primary outcome was concordance between PET/CT and EBUS-TBNA for nodal metastases. Secondary endpoints included sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) of PET/CT, and clinical outcomes based on staging results. Results: Among 115 patients, the concordance between PET/CT and EBUS-TBNA was 84.3% (95% CI: 0.76 0.90). EBUS-TBNA led to a stage shift in 15.7% of cases: 4 of 98 PET/CT N0 patients (4.1%) had nodal metastases, while 14 of 17 PET/CT N1 patients (82.4%) were downstaged to N0. PET/CT sensitivity was 42.9% (95% CI: 0.09–0.81), specificity 87% (95% CI: 0.79–0.93), PPV 17.6% (95% CI: 0.04–0.43), and NPV 95.9% (95% CI: 0.90–0.99). PET/CT-positive, EBUS-TBNA-negative patients had worse survival (HR 4.25, 95% CI: 1.24–14.53, p = 0.021) compared with double-negative patients. Conclusions: EBUS-TBNA improves staging accuracy over PET/CT in early-stage NSCLC, impacting SBRT candidacy. However, PET/CT-positive, EBUS-TBNA-negative patients had worse outcomes in comparison to double-negative patients, suggesting a need for additional therapy or surveillance in that population.Item What exactly is a centrally located lung tumor? Results of an online survey(American Thoracic Society, 2017) Casal, Roberto; Vial, Macarena; Miller, Russell; Mudambi, Lakshmi; Grosu, Horiana B.; Eapen, George A.; Jimenez, Carlos A.; Morice, Rodolfo C.; Cornwell, Lorraine; Ost, DavidRATIONALE: Accurate mediastinal staging is a cornerstone in the management of patients with lung cancer. For patients with radiographically normal mediastinum, current lung cancer guidelines recommend invasive mediastinal staging when tumors are centrally located. However, definitions of central tumors are nonspecific, and there are discrepancies among guidelines (e.g., some use the inner one-third of the hemithorax, whereas others use the inner two-thirds). OBJECTIVES: To describe the definitions of central tumors used by pulmonologists and thoracic surgeons in their practices. METHODS: An online questionnaire was e-mailed to members of the American Association for Bronchology and Interventional Pulmonology and members of the Cardiothoracic Surgery Network. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: A total of 218 participants completed our survey (12% response rate). Most common definitions for central tumors were: inner one-third of the hemithorax (55%), in contact with hilar structures (29%), and inner two-thirds of the hemithorax (15%). Of note, 29% of participants chose a definition fabricated specifically for this survey and not supported by guidelines. Regarding the method to delineate the thirds of the hemithorax, 182 (84%) participants chose a system of concentric lines arising in the hilum, whereas 31 (14%) chose straight lines in the sagittal plane of the chest. We found strikingly similar responses in members of both societies. CONCLUSIONS: A uniform definition of tumor centrality is currently lacking, and should be formulated. Studies using objective measurements that evaluate the ability of these different definitions of central lung tumors to predict N2 disease are needed to construct a clear and evidence-based definition.