Browsing by Author "Gonlachanvit, Sutep"
Now showing 1 - 3 of 3
Results Per Page
Sort Options
Item Esophageal motility disorders on high-resolution manometry: Chicago classification version 4.0(2021) Yadlapati, Rena; Kahrilas, Peter J.; Fox, Mark R.; Bredenoord, Albert J.; Gyawali, C. Prakash; Roman, Sabine; Babaei, Arash; Mittal, Ravinder K.; Rommel, Nathalie; Savarino, Edoardo; Sifrim, Daniel; Smout, André; Vaezi, Michael F.; Zerbib, Frank; Akiyama, Junichi; Bhatia, Shobna; Bor, Serhat; Carlson, Dustin A.; Chen, Joan W.; Cisternas, Daniel; Cock, Charles; Coss-Adame, Enrique; Bortoli, Nicola de; Defilippi, Claudia; Fass, Ronnie; Ghoshal, Uday C.; Gonlachanvit, Sutep; Hani, Albis; Hebbard, Geoffrey S.; Jung, Kee Wook; Katz, Philip; Katzka, David A.; Khan, Abraham; Kohn, Geoffrey Paul; Lazarescu, Adriana; Lengliner, Johannes; Mittal, Sumeet K.; Omari, Taher; Park, Moo I.; Penagini, Roberto; Pohl, Daniel; Richter, Joel E.; Serra, Jordi; Sweis, Rami; Tack, Jan; Tatum, Roger P.; Tutuian, Radu; Vela, Marcelo F.; Wong, Reuben K.; Wu, Justin C.; Xiao, Yinglian; Pandolfino, John E.Chicago Classification v4.0 (CCv4.0) is the updated classification scheme for esopha-geal motility disorders using metrics from high-resolution manometry (HRM). Fifty-two diverse international experts separated into seven working subgroups utilized formal validated methodologies over two-years to develop CCv4.0. Key updates in CCv.4.0 consist of a more rigorous and expansive HRM protocol that incorporates supine and upright test positions as well as provocative testing, a refined definition of esophagogastric junction (EGJ) outflow obstruction (EGJOO), more stringent diag-nostic criteria for ineffective esophageal motility and description of baseline EGJ met-rics. Further, the CCv4.0 sought to define motility disorder diagnoses as conclusive and inconclusive based on associated symptoms, and findings on provocative testing as well as supportive testing with barium esophagram with tablet and/or functional lumen imaging probe. These changes attempt to minimize ambiguity in prior iterations of Chicago Classification and provide more standardized and rigorous criteria for pat-terns of disorders of peristalsis and obstruction at the EGJItem Esophagogastric junction morphology and contractile integral on high-resolution manometry in asymptomatic healthy volunteers: An international multicenter study(2021) Rogers, Benjamin D.; Rengarajan, Arvind; Abrahao, Luiz; Bhatia, Shobna; Bor, Serhat; Carlson, Dustin A.; Cisternas, Daniel; Gonlachanvit, SutepBackground: Esophagogastric junction contractile integral (EGJ-CI) and EGJ mor -phology are high-resolution manometry (HRM) metrics that assess EGJ barrier func -tion. Normative data standardized across world regions and HRM manufacturers are limited.Methods: Our aim was to determine normative EGJ metrics in a large international cohort of healthy volunteers undergoing HRM (Medtronic, Laborie, and Diversatek software) acquired from 16 countries in four world regions. EGJ-CI was calculated by the same two investigators using a distal contractile integral-like measurement across the EGJ for three respiratory cycles and corrected for respiration (mm Hg cm), using manufacturer-specific software tools. EGJ morphology was designated according to Chicago Classification v3.0. Median EGJ-CI values were calculated across age, gen -ders, HRM systems, and regions.Results: Of 484 studies (28.0 years, 56.2% F, 60.7% Medtronic studies, 26.0% Laborie, and 13.2% Diversatek), EGJ morphology was type 1 in 97.1%. MedianEGJ-CI was similar between Medtronic (37.0 mm Hg cm, IQR 23.6-53.7 mm Hg cm) and Diversatek (34.9 mm Hg cm, IQR 22.1-56.1 mm Hg cm, P = 0.87), but was signif-icantly higher using Laborie equipment (56.5 mm Hg cm, IQR 35.0-75.3 mm Hg cm, P < 0.001). 5th percentile EGJ-CI values ranged from 6.9 to 12.1 mm Hg cm. EGJ-CI values were consistent across world regions, but different between manufacturers even within the same world region (P ≤ 0.001). Within Medtronic studies, EGJ-CIand basal LESP were similar in younger and older individuals (P ≥ 0.3) but higher in women (P < 0.001).Conclusions: EGJ morphology is predominantly type 1 in healthy adults. EGJ-CI varies widely in health, with significant gender influence, but is consistent within each HRM system. Manufacturer-specific normative values should be utilized for clinical HRM interpretation.Publication High-resolution manometry thresholds and motor patterns among asymptomatic individuals.(2022) Rengarajan, Arvind; Rogers, Benjamin D.; Wong, Zhiqin; Tolone, Salvatore; Sifrim, Daniel; Serra, Jordi; Savarino, Edoardo; Roman, Sabine; Remes-Troche, Jose M.; Ramos, Rosa; Perez de la Serna, Julio; Pauwels, Ans; Leguizamo, Ana Maria; Yeh Lee, Yeong; Kawamura, Osamu; Hayat, Jamal; Hani, Albis; Gonlachanvit, Sutep; Cisternas, Daniel; Cisternas, Daniel; Carlson, Dustin; Bor, Serhat; Bhatia, Shobna; Abrahao, Luiz; Pandolfino, John; Gyawali, C. PrakashObjective: High-resolution manometry (HRM) is the current standard for characterization of esophageal body and esophagogastric junction (EGJ) function. We aimed to examine the prevalence of abnormal esophageal motor patterns in health, and to determine optimal thresholds for software metrics across HRM systems. Design: Manometry studies from asymptomatic adults were solicited from motility centers worldwide, and were manually analyzed using integrated relaxation pressure (IRP), distal latency (DL), and distal contractile integral (DCI) in standardized fashion. Normative thresholds were assessed using fifth and/or 95th percentile values. Chicago Classification v3.0 criteria were applied to determine motor patterns across HRM systems, study positions (upright vs supine), ages, and genders. Results: Of 469 unique HRM studies (median age 28.0, range 18-79 years). 74.6% had a normal HRM pattern; none had achalasia. Ineffective esophageal motility (IEM) was the most frequent motor pattern identified (15.1% overall), followed by EGJ outflow obstruction (5.3%). Proportions with IEM were lower using stringent criteria (10.0%), especially in supine studies (7.1%-8.5%). Other motor patterns were rare (0.2%-4.1% overall) and did not vary by age or gender. DL thresholds were close to current norms across HRM systems, while IRP thresholds varied by HRM system and study position. Both fifth and 95th percentile DCI values were lower than current thresholds, both in upright and supine positions. Conclusions: Motor abnormalities are infrequent in healthy individuals and consist mainly of IEM, proportions of which are lower when using stringent criteria in the supine position. Thresholds for HRM metrics vary by HRM system and study position.