Browsing by Author "Eapen, George A."
Now showing 1 - 5 of 5
Results Per Page
Sort Options
Item Combined pleuroscopy and endobronchial ultrasound for diagnosis and staging of suspected lung cancer(2018) Rodríguez Vial, Macarena; Eapen, George A.; Casal, Roberto F.; Sarkiss, Mona G.; Ost, David E.; Vakil, Erik; Grosu, Horiana B.The standard approach to staging of lung cancer in patients with pleural effusion (clinical M1a) is thoracentesis followed by pleural biopsies if the cytologic analysis is negative. If pleural biopsy findings are negative, endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration is used to complete the staging process and, in some cases, obtain diagnosis. In this case series we report 7 patients in which a combined procedure was performed for staging of known or suspected lung cancer. We found that the combined approach was both feasible and safe in this case series.Item Diagnostic performance of endobronchial ultrasound-guided mediastinal lymph node sampling in early stage non-small cell lung cancer: A prospective study(2018) Rodríguez Vial, Macarena; O’connell, Oisin J.; Grosu, Horiana B.; Hernández, Mike; Noor, Laila; Casal, Roberto F.; Stewart, John; Sarkiss, Mona; Jiménez, Carlos A.; Rice, David; Mehran, Reza; Ost, David E.; Eapen, George A.Background and objective: Standard nodal staging of lung cancer consists of positron emission tomography/ computed tomography (PET/CT), followed by endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) if PET/CT shows mediastinal lymphadenopathy. Sensitivity of EBUS-TBNA in patients with N0/N1 disease by PET/CT is unclear and largely based on retrospective studies. We assessed the sensitivity of EBUS-TBNA in this setting. Methods: We enrolled patients with proven or suspected lung cancer staged as N0/N1 by PET/CT and without metastatic disease (M0), who underwent staging EBUS-TBNA. Primary outcome was sensitivity of EBUS-TBNA compared with a composite reference standard of surgical stage or EBUS-TBNA stage if EBUS demonstrated N2/N3 disease. Results: Seventy-five patients were included in the analysis. Mean tumour size was 3.52 cm (1.63). Fifteen of 75 patients (20%) had N2 disease. EBUS-TBNA identified six while nine were only identified at surgery. Sensitivity of EBUS-TBNA for N2 disease was 40% (95% CI: 16.3–67.7%). Conclusion: A significant proportion of patients with N0/N1 disease by PET/CT had N2 disease (20%) and EBUS-TBNA identified a substantial fraction of these patients, thus improving diagnostic accuracy compared with PET/CT alone. Sensitivity of EBUS-TBNA however appears lower compared with historical data from patients with larger volume mediastinal disease. Therefore, strategies to improve EBUS-TBNA accuracy in this population should be further exploredItem Endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration in the nodal staging of stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy patients(Elsevier, 2017) Vial, Macarena; Khan, Kashif A.; O’Connell, Oisin; Peng, S. Andrew; Gomez, Daniel R.; Chang, Joe Y.; Rice, David C.; Mehran, Reza; Jimenez, Carlos J.; Grosu, Horiana B.; Ost, David E; Eapen, George A.BACKGROUND: Patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) being evaluated for stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy (SABR) are typically staged noninvasively with positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT). Incorporating endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) into the staging workup of these patients has not been evaluated. Our primary objective was to compare the performance of PET/CT with EBUS-TBNA for intrathoracic nodal assessment among SABR-eligible patients. METHODS: This was a retrospective study consisting of two parts. First, we assessed the concordance for nodal metastasis of PET/CT and EBUS-TBNA. Second, we evaluated clinical outcomes among patients who underwent SABR with and without a prior EBUS-TBNA. RESULTS: We identified 246 eligible patients. Compared with PET/CT, EBUS-TBNA led to a stage shift in 48 of 246 patients (19%). Of 174 N0 patients by PET/CT, 6 (3.4%) had nodal metastasis on EBUS-TBNA. Among 72 clinical N1 patients, 36 (50%) were downstaged to N0 after EBUS-TBNA, therefore becoming eligible for SABR. Concordance between PET/CT and EBUS-TBNA for nodal metastasis was 83% (κ = 0.53). Clinical outcomes of patients who underwent SABR with or without a prior EBUS-TBNA did not differ significantly. CONCLUSIONS: Concordance of PET/CT and EBUS-TBNA for nodal disease was only moderate. Incorporating EBUS-TBNA into the staging workup was beneficial in identifying occult nodal metastasis that would otherwise be left untreated with SABR and in expanding the pool of potentially SABR-eligible patients.Item Pleural Touch Preparations and Direct Visualization of the Pleura during Medical Thoracoscopy for the Diagnosis of Malignancy(2017) Grosu, Horiana B.; Vial-Rodriguez, Macarena; Vakil, Erik; Casal, Roberto F.; Eapen, George A.; Morice, Rodolfo; Stewart, John; Sarkiss, Mona G.; Ost, David E.Rationale: During diagnostic thoracoscopy, talc pleurodesis after biopsy is appropriate if the probability of malignancy is sufficiently high. Findings on direct visual assessment of the pleura during thoracoscopy, rapid onsite evaluation (ROSE) of touch preparations (touch preps) of thoracoscopic biopsy specimens, and preoperative imaging may help predict the likelihood of malignancy; however, data on the performance of these methods are limited. Objectives: To assess the performance of ROSE of touch preps, direct visual assessment of the pleura during thoracoscopy, and preoperative imaging in diagnosing malignancy. Methods: Patients who underwent ROSE of touch preps during thoracoscopy for suspected malignancy were retrospectively reviewed. Malignancy was diagnosed on the basis of final pathologic examination of pleural biopsy specimens. ROSE results were categorized as malignant, benign, or atypical cells. Visual assessment results were categorized as tumor studding present or absent. Positron emission tomography (PET) and computed tomography (CT) findings were categorized as abnormal or normal pleura. Likelihood ratios were calculated for each category of test result. Results: The study included 44 patients, 26 (59%) with a final pathologic diagnosis of malignancy. Likelihood ratios were as follows: for ROSE of touch preps: malignant, 1.97 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.90–4.34); atypical cells, 0.69 (95% CI, 0.21–2.27); benign, 0.11 (95% CI, 0.01–0.93); for direct visual assessment: tumor studding present, 3.63 (95% CI, 1.32–9.99); tumor studding absent, 0.24 (95% CI, 0.09–0.64); for PET: abnormal pleura, 9.39 (95% CI, 1.42–62); normal pleura, 0.24 (95% CI, 0.11–0.52); and for CT: abnormal pleura, 13.15 (95% CI, 1.93–89.63); normal pleura, 0.28 (95% CI, 0.15–0.54). Conclusions: A finding of no malignant cells on ROSE of touch preps during thoracoscopy lowers the likelihood of malignancy significantly, whereas finding of tumor studding on direct visual assessment during thoracoscopy only moderately increases the likelihood of malignancy. A positive finding on PET and/or CT increases the likelihood of malignancy significantly in a moderate-risk patient group and can be used as an adjunct to predict malignancy before pleurodesis.Item What exactly is a centrally located lung tumor? Results of an online survey(American Thoracic Society, 2017) Casal, Roberto; Vial, Macarena; Miller, Russell; Mudambi, Lakshmi; Grosu, Horiana B.; Eapen, George A.; Jimenez, Carlos A.; Morice, Rodolfo C.; Cornwell, Lorraine; Ost, DavidRATIONALE: Accurate mediastinal staging is a cornerstone in the management of patients with lung cancer. For patients with radiographically normal mediastinum, current lung cancer guidelines recommend invasive mediastinal staging when tumors are centrally located. However, definitions of central tumors are nonspecific, and there are discrepancies among guidelines (e.g., some use the inner one-third of the hemithorax, whereas others use the inner two-thirds). OBJECTIVES: To describe the definitions of central tumors used by pulmonologists and thoracic surgeons in their practices. METHODS: An online questionnaire was e-mailed to members of the American Association for Bronchology and Interventional Pulmonology and members of the Cardiothoracic Surgery Network. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: A total of 218 participants completed our survey (12% response rate). Most common definitions for central tumors were: inner one-third of the hemithorax (55%), in contact with hilar structures (29%), and inner two-thirds of the hemithorax (15%). Of note, 29% of participants chose a definition fabricated specifically for this survey and not supported by guidelines. Regarding the method to delineate the thirds of the hemithorax, 182 (84%) participants chose a system of concentric lines arising in the hilum, whereas 31 (14%) chose straight lines in the sagittal plane of the chest. We found strikingly similar responses in members of both societies. CONCLUSIONS: A uniform definition of tumor centrality is currently lacking, and should be formulated. Studies using objective measurements that evaluate the ability of these different definitions of central lung tumors to predict N2 disease are needed to construct a clear and evidence-based definition.