Repository logo
  • Communities & Collections
  • All of DSpace
  • English
  • Español
  • Português do Brasil
  • Log In
    New user? Click here to register. Have you forgotten your password?
  • English
  • Español
  • Português do Brasil
  • Log In
    New user? Click here to register. Have you forgotten your password?
  1. Home
  2. Browse by Author

Browsing by Author "Dominguez, Angelica"

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Results Per Page
Sort Options
  • Loading...
    Thumbnail Image
    Publication
    Growth of Very Low Birth Weight Infants Who Received a Liquid Human Milk Fortifier: A Randomized, Controlled Multicenter Trial
    (2022) Masoli, Daniela; Mena, Patricia; Dominguez, Angelica; Ramolfo, Pamela; Vernal, Patricia; Pantoja, Miguel Angel; Esparza, Ruth; Hübner, ME; Ríos, Antonio; Faunes, Miriam; Uauy, Ricardo; Tapia, Jose L.
    Objectives: To evaluate growth (weight, length, head circumference, and knee–heel length [KHL]) in very low birth weight (VLBW) infants (500–1500 g) who received human milk with a liquid fortifier (LHMF) with high protein and fatty acid content versus a traditional powder fortifier (PHMF) for 45 days or until discharge. Methods: This was a multicenter, randomized, controlled trial. An intention-to-treat analysis was performed to determine adverse events and withdrawal causes. We also performed an efficacy analysis involving the infants who completed at least 2 weeks of study. Results: Of the 158 infants enrolled in the study, 146 completed at least 2 weeks, and 125 completed the entire study. The biodemographic characteristics were similar between groups, with no differences in increments of weight (22.9 vs 22.7 g kg1 day1 ), length (1.03 vs 1.09 cm/week), head circumference (0.91 vs 0.90 cm/week), or KHL (3.6 vs 3.3 mm/week). The KHL increment was greater in infants weighing >1 kg receiving LHMF (3.7 vs 3.2 mm/week, P ¼ 0.027). Although there were no significant differences in serious adverse events, the incidence difference of the composite outcome death/necrotizing enterocolitis between groups warrants attention (1.3% with LHMF and 8.1% with PHMF). Conclusion: There were no differences in the overall growth between VLBW infants receiving either fortifier.

Santiago

Av. La Plaza Nº 680, Las Condes

Concepción

Ainavillo Nº 456, Concepción

Logo Universidad del Desarrollo

Implementado por OpenGeek Services