Browsing by Author "Dietz, H"
Now showing 1 - 4 of 4
Results Per Page
Sort Options
Item Does the Epi-No-(R) birth trainer prevent vaginal birth-related pelvic floor trauma? A multicentre prospective randomised controlled trial(John Wiley & Sons, 2016) Kamisan, Atan; Shek, K; Langer, S; Guzmán Rojas, Rodrigo; Caudwell-Hall, J; Daly, J; Dietz, HOBJECTIVE: Vaginal childbirth may result in levator ani injury secondary to overdistension during the second stage of labour. Other injuries include perineal and anal sphincter tears. Antepartum use of a birth trainer may prevent such injuries by altering the biomechanical properties of the pelvic floor. This study evaluates the effects of Epi-No(®) use on intrapartum pelvic floor trauma. DESIGN: Multicentre prospective randomised controlled trial. SETTING: Two tertiary obstetric units in Australia. POPULATION: Nulliparous women carrying an uncomplicated singleton term pregnancy. METHODS: Participants were assessed clinically and with 4D translabial ultrasound in the late third trimester, and again at 3-6 months postpartum. Women randomised to the intervention group were asked to use the Epi-No(®) device from 37 weeks of gestation until delivery. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Levator ani, anal sphincter, and perineal trauma diagnosed clinically and/or with translabial ultrasound imaging. RESULTS: Of 660 women randomised, 504 (76.4%) returned for assessment at a mean of 5 months postpartum. There was no significant difference in the incidence of levator avulsion [12 versus 15%; relative risk (RR) 0.82, 95% confidence interval (95% CI) 0.51-1.32; absolute risk reduction (ARR) 0.03, 95% CI -0.04 to 0.09; P = 0.39], irreversible hiatal overdistension (13 versus 15%; RR 0.86, 95% CI 0.52-1.42; ARR 0.02, 95% CI -0.05 to 0.09; P = 0.51), clinical anal sphincter trauma (7 versus 6%; RR 1.12, 95% CI 0.49-2.60; ARR -0.01, 95% CI -0.05 to 0.06; P = 0.77), and perineal tears (51 versus 53%; RR 0.96, 95% CI 0.78-1.17; ARR 0.02, 95% CI -0.08 to 0.13; P = 0.65). A marginally higher rate of significant defects of the external anal sphincter on ultrasound was observed in the intervention group (21 versus 14%; RR 1.44, 95% CI 0.97-2.20; ARR -0.06, 95% CI -0.13 to 0.05; P = 0.07). CONCLUSION: Antenatal use of the Epi-No(®) device is unlikely to be clinically beneficial in the prevention of intrapartum levator ani damage, or anal sphincter and perineal traumaItem Pelvic floor trauma: does the second baby matter?(John Wiley & Sons, 2014) Horak, T; Guzmán Rojas, Rodrigo; Shek, K; Dietz, HOBJECTIVE: To ascertain the effect of a second delivery on pelvic floor anatomy. METHODS: This was a retrospective analysis of data obtained in two perinatal imaging studies. Women were invited for antenatal and two postnatal appointments. All had answered a standardized questionnaire and undergone a clinical examination and translabial four-dimensional ultrasound. Ultrasound volumes were acquired at rest, on Valsalva maneuver and on pelvic floor muscle contraction, and analyzed by postprocessing on a PC. Avulsion was diagnosed on tomographic ultrasound imaging. This study reports data obtained in those women who delivered a second child between the first and second postnatal assessments. RESULTS: Of 715 participants, 94 reported a second birth at their second postnatal appointment on average 2.7 years after their first birth; 65 had a vaginal delivery and 29 a Cesarean section. There were nine attempts at vaginal birth after Cesarean section (VBAC), of which six were successful. When we analyzed the ultrasound findings before and after a second delivery, there was no significant change observed in bladder-neck descent, cystocele descent and hiatal area on Valsalva. Delivery mode of the second birth seemed to have little effect on changes observed between follow-ups, although there was a trend towards increased bladder-neck descent in women after vaginal delivery. On reviewing patients diagnosed with avulsion at their 2-3-year visit and comparing them with findings at the first follow-up visit, we found identical (normal) findings in 87 cases. In five there was an unchanged avulsion. In one case, findings had improved from complete to partial avulsion. There was one new avulsion, in a patient who had delivered her first baby by emergency Cesarean section and her second by vacuum delivery. CONCLUSIONS: A second pregnancy and delivery do not seem to have a major effect on bladder support and/or levator function. However, we documented a case of major levator trauma after VBAC. The issue of pelvic floor trauma after VBAC may have to be investigated further.Item Prevalence of anal sphincter injury in primiparous women(John Wiley & Sons, 2013) Guzmán Rojas, Rodrigo; Shek, K; Langer, S; Dietz, HOBJECTIVE: To determine the prevalence of obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASIS) in a cohort of primiparous women and to evaluate their association with demographic, obstetric and ultrasound parameters. METHODS: This was a retrospective analysis of the ultrasound volume datasets of 320 primiparous women, acquired at 5 months postpartum. Tomographic ultrasound imaging (TUI) was used to evaluate the external anal sphincter (EAS). A significant EAS defect was diagnosed if a defect of > 30° was seen in four or more of six TUI slices bracketing the EAS. RESULTS: Significant EAS defects were found in 69 women (27.9% of those delivered vaginally). In nine of those a third-degree tear was diagnosed intrapartum and was sutured. In 60 women with significant defects there was no documentation of sphincter damage at birth, implying unidentified or occult defects (60/69, 87.0%). Among them, 29 had had a second-degree tear, two a first-degree tear and three an intact perineum. In 31 cases an episiotomy had been performed, with five extensions to a third-degree tear. On multivariate analysis only forceps delivery was significantly associated with OASIS. CONCLUSIONS: In this cohort of primiparous women we found OASIS in 27.9% of vaginally parous women, most of which had not been diagnosed in the delivery suite. There seems to be a need for better education of labor-ward staff in the recognition of OASIS. On the other hand, it is conceivable that some defects may be masked by intact tissue. The significance of such defects remains doubtful. Forceps delivery was the only identifiable risk factor.Item Temporal latency between pelvic floor trauma and presentation for prolapse surgery: a retrospective observational study(Springer, 2015) Thomas, V; Shek, K; Guzmán Rojas, Rodrigo; Dietz, HINTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: Levator avulsion is an etiological factor for female pelvic organ prolapse (POP) and generally occurs during a first vaginal birth. However, most women with POP present decades later. This study aimed to estimate latency between pelvic floor trauma and presentation for POP surgery. METHODS: This was a retrospective observational study in a tertiary urogynecological unit to which 354 patients presented for evaluation prior to prolapse surgery between June 2011 and December 2012. All underwent an interview, clinical assessment [International Continence Society Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification score (ICS POPQ) and 4D translabial ultrasound (US). Postprocessing analysis of US volumes was blinded against clinical data. The main outcome measure was temporal latency between first vaginal birth and prolapse presentation in women with levator avulsion. RESULTS: Three hundred and fifty-four patients presented with symptoms of prolapse, of whom 115 (32 %) were found to have an avulsion of the levator ani muscle. Of these, 30 patients were excluded due to previous prolapse surgery, leaving 85, all of whom showed significant prolapse on US and/or clinical staging. Mean latency between first vaginal delivery and presentation was 33.5 (3-66.3) years. There were no associations between latency and potential predictors, except for maternal age at first birth, which was associated with shorter latency (r = -0.45 , P < 0.001). There was a trend toward shorter latency after forceps delivery (P = 0.09). CONCLUSIONS: Average latency between first birth and presentation for prolapse surgery in women with avulsion was 33.5 (3-66) years. Maternal age at first vaginal birth and possibly forceps delivery were associated with shorter time to presentation.