Browsing by Author "Cristiani, Federico"

Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Driving Pressure and Normalized Energy Transmission Calculations in Mechanically Ventilated Children Without Lung Disease and Pediatric Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome
    (2021) Díaz, Franco; González-Dambrauskass, Sebastián; Cristiani, Federico; Casanova, Daniel R.; Cruces, Pablo
    OBJECTIVES: To compare the new tools to evaluate the energy dissipated to the lung parenchyma in mechanically ventilated children with and without lung injury. We compared their discrimination capability between both groups when indexed by ideal body weight and driving pressure. DESIGN: Post hoc analysis of individual patient data from two previously published studies describing pulmonary mechanics. SETTING: Two academic hospitals in Latin-America. PATIENTS: Mechanically ventilated patients younger than 15 years old were included. We analyzed two groups, 30 children under general anesthesia (ANESTH group) and 38 children with pediatric acute respiratory distress syndrome. INTERVENTIONS: Respiratory mechanics were measured after intubation in all patients. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Mechanical power and derived variables of the equation of motion (dynamic power, driving power, and mechanical energy) were computed and then indexed by ideal body weight. Driving pressure was higher in pediatric acute respiratory distress syndrome group compared with ANESTH group. Receiver operator curve analysis showed that driving pressure had the best discrimination capability compared with all derived variables of the equation of motion indexed by ideal body weight. The same results were observed when the subgroup of patients weighs less than 15kg. There was no difference in unindexed mechanical power between groups. CONCLUSIONS: Driving pressure is the variable that better discriminates pediatric acute respiratory distress syndrome from nonpediatric acute respiratory distress syndrome in children than the calculations derived from the equation of motion, even when indexed by ideal body weight. Unindexed mechanical power was useless to differentiate against both groups. Future studies should determine the threshold for variables of the energy dissipated by the lungs and their association with clinical outcomes.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Positive end-expiratory pressure improves elastic working pressure in anesthetized children
    (2018) Cruces, Pablo; González-Dambrauskas, Sebastián; Cristiani, Federico; Martínez, Javier; Henderson, Ronnie; Erranz, Benjamín; Díaz, Franco
    Background Positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) has been demonstrated to decrease ventilator-induced lung injury in patients under mechanical ventilation (MV) for acute respiratory failure. Recently, some studies have proposed some beneficial effects of PEEP in ventilated patients without lung injury. The influence of PEEP on respiratory mechanics in children is not well known. Our aim was to determine the effects on respiratory mechanics of setting PEEP at 5 cmH2O in anesthetized healthy children. Methods Patients younger than 15 years old without history of lung injury scheduled for elective surgery gave informed consent and were enrolled in the study. After usual care for general anesthesia, patients were placed on volume controlled MV. Two sets of respiratory mechanics studies were performed using inspiratory and expiratory breath hold, with PEEP 0 and 5 cmH2O. The maximum inspiratory and expiratory flow (QI and QE) as well as peak inspiratory pressure (PIP), plateau pressure (PPL) and total PEEP (tPEEP) were measured. Respiratory system compliance (CRS), inspiratory and expiratory resistances (RawI and RawE) and time constants (KTI and KTE) were calculated. Data were expressed as median and interquartile range (IQR). Wilcoxon sign test and Spearman’s analysis were used. Significance was set at P < 0.05. Results We included 30 patients, median age 39 (15–61.3) months old, 60% male. When PEEP increased, PIP increased from 12 (11,14) to 15.5 (14,18), and CRS increased from 0.9 (0.9,1.2) to 1.2 (0.9,1.4) mL·kg− 1·cmH2O− 1; additionally, when PEEP increased, driving pressure decreased from 6.8 (5.9,8.1) to 5.8 (4.7,7.1) cmH2O, and QE decreased from 13.8 (11.8,18.7) to 11.7 (9.1,13.5) L·min− 1 (all P < 0.01). There were no significant changes in resistance and QI. Conclusions Analysis of respiratory mechanics in anesthetized healthy children shows that PEEP at 5 cmH2O places the respiratory system in a better position in the P/V curve. A better understanding of lung mechanics may lead to changes in the traditional ventilatory approach, limiting injury associated with MV.

Implementado por OpenGeek Services