DSpace Repository :: Browsing by Author "Arshad, Qadeer"

Browsing by Author "Arshad, Qadeer"

Now showing 1 - 4 of 4

Head shaking does not alter vestibulo ocular reflex gain in vestibular migraine
(2022) Patel, Priyani; Castro, Patricia; Kooh, Nehzat; Arshad, Qadeer; Gargallo, Lucia; Carmona, Sergio; Kaski, Diego
Vestibular Migraine (VM) is the most common cause of non-positional episodic vestibular symptoms. Patients with VM commonly report increased motion sensitivity, suggesting that vestibular responses to head movement may identify changes specific to VM patients. Here we explore whether the vestibulo-ocular reflex (VOR) gain alters in response to a clinical “headshake” maneuver in patients with VM. Thirty patients with VM in the inter-ictal phase, 16 patients with Benign Positional Paroxysmal Vertigo (BPPV) and 15 healthy controls were recruited. Patients responded to the question “Do you feel sick reading in the passenger seat of a car?” and completed a validated motion sickness questionnaire as a measure of motion sensitivity. Lateral canal vHIT testing was performed before and after headshaking; the change in VOR gain was calculated as the primary outcome. Baseline VOR gain was within normal limits across all participants. There was no significant change in VOR gain after headshaking in any group (p = 0.264). Patients were 4.3 times more likely to be in the VM group than in the BPPV group if they reported nausea when reading in the passenger seat of a car. We postulate that a headshake stimulus may be insufficient to disrupt cortical interactions and induce a change in VOR gain. Alternatively, changes in VOR gain may only be apparent in the acute phase of VM. Reading in the passenger seat of a car was considered uncomfortable in all VM patients suggesting that this specific question may be useful for the diagnosis of VM.
Priming overconfidence in belief systems reveals negative return on postural control mechanisms
(2022) Castro, Patricia; Papoutselou, Efstratia; Mahmoud, Sami; Hussain, Shahvaiz; Fuentealba Bassaletti, Constanza; Kaski, Diego; Bronstein, Adolfo; Arshad, Qadeer
Background: Modulation of postural control strategies and heightened perceptual ratings of instability when exposed to postural threats, illustrates the association between anxiety and postural control. Research question: Here we test whether modulating prior expectations can engender postural-related anxiety which, in turn, may impair postural control and dissociate the well-established relationship between sway and subjective instability. Methods: We modulated expectations of the difficulty posed by an upcoming postural task via priming. In the visual priming condition, participants watched a video of an actor performing the task with either a stable or unstable performance, before themselves proceeding with the postural task. In the verbal priming paradigm, participants were given erroneous verbal information regarding the amplitude of the forthcoming platform movement, or no prior information. Results: Following the visual priming, the normal relationship between trunk sway and subjective instability was preserved only in those individuals that viewed the stable but not the unstable actor. In the verbal priming experiment we observed an increase in subjective instability and anxiety during task performance in individuals who were erroneously primed that sled amplitude would increase, when in fact it did not. Significance: Our findings show that people's subjective experiences of instability and anxiety during a balancing task are powerfully modulated by priming. The contextual provision of erroneous cognitive priors dissociates the normally 'hard wired' relationship between objective measures and subjective ratings of sway. Our findings have potential clinical significance for the development of enhanced cognitive retraining in patients with balance disorders, e.g. via modifying expectations.
Subjective stability perception is related to postural anxiety in older subjects
(Elsevier B.V., 2019-02) Castro, Patricia; Kaski, Diego; Schieppati, Marco; Furman, Michael; Arshad, Qadeer; Bronstein, Adolfo
Background: Under static conditions, the objective and subjective measures of postural stability correlate well. However, age-related changes in postural control and task-related anxiety may modify the relationship between these subjective and objective measures. Ultimately, patients' symptoms represent subjective reports, thus understanding this relationship has clinical implications. Aims: This study investigates the relationship between subjective-objective measures of postural stability in dynamic conditions and whether this relationship is influenced by age or task-related anxiety. Methods: 50 healthy participants (aged 18-83 years) stood on a platform oscillating at variable amplitudes, with-without a fall-preventing harness to modulate task-related anxiety. Trunk sway path, hip velocity and foot lifts (objective measures) and subjective scores of instability and task-related anxiety were recorded. Results: The subjective perception of stability accurately matched objective body sway, following a logarithmic function profile (r2 = 0.72, p < 0.001). This function did not change significantly with age, harness or task presentation order. A strong relationship was observed between subjective measures of stability and task-related anxiety for all subjects (r = 0.81, p < 0.001). Task repetition reduced anxiety in the young, uncoupling anxiety changes from subjective instability, but not in the elderly who retained higher anxiety levels in line with subjective unsteadiness. Discussion: Subjects accurately rate their own instability during dynamic postural challenges, irrespective of age and actual fall risk. However, anxiety may selectively modulate the perception of instability in older subjects. The perception of stability relies upon the integration of sensory afferents but also recruits emotional-cognitive processes, particularly in older individuals. The use of a safety harness has no influence on subjective or objective postural stability.
Viewing Target Distance Influences the Vestibulo-Ocular Reflex Gain when Assessed Using the Video Head Impulse Test
(2019) Castro, Patricia; Esteves, Sara Sena; Lerchundi, Florencia; Buckwell, David; Gresty, Michael A.; Bronstein, Adolfo M.; Arshad, Qadeer
Gaze stabilization during head movements is provided by the vestibulo-ocular reflex (VOR). Clinical assessment of this reflex is performed using the video Head Impulse Test (vHIT). To date, the influence of different fixation distances on VOR gain using the vHIT has not been explored. We assessed the effect of target proximity on the horizontal VOR using the vHIT. Firstly, we assessed the VOR gain in 18 healthy subjects with 5 viewing target distances (150, 40, 30, 20, and 10 cm). The gain increased significantly as the viewing target distance decreased. A second experiment on 10 subjects was performed in darkness whilst the subjects were imagining targets at different distances. There were significant inverse relationships between gain and distance for both the real and the imaginary targets. There was a statistically significant difference between light and dark gains for the 20- and 40-cm distances, but not for the 150-cm distance. Theoretical VOR gains for different target distances were calculated and compared with those found in light and darkness. The increase in gain observed for near targets was lower than predicted by geometrical calculations, implying a physiological ceiling effect on the VOR. The VOR gain in the dark, as assessed with the vHIT, demonstrates an enhancement associated with a reduced target distance.

Browsing by Author "Arshad, Qadeer"

Results Per Page

Sort Options