Browsing by Author "Amaya, Pablo"
Now showing 1 - 3 of 3
Results Per Page
Sort Options
Item COVID-19 Lockdown Effects on Acute Stroke Care in Latin America(2021) Pujol-Lereis, Virginia A.; Flores, Alan; Barboza, Miguel A.; Abanto-Argomedo, Carlos; Amaya, Pablo; Bayona, Hernán; Bonardo, Pablo; Díaz-Escobar, Luis; Gómez-Schneider, Maia; Góngora-Rivera, Fernando; Lavados, Pablo; León, Carolina; Luraschi, Adriana; Márquez-Romero, Juan Manuel; Ouriques-Martins, Sheila C.; Navia, Víctor; Ruiz-Franco, Angélica; Vences, Miguel Angel; Zurru, María Cristina; Arauz, Antonio; Ameriso, Sebastián; Latin American Stroke rEgistry (LASE) COVID-19 Collaborators.Objectives: COVID-19 pandemic has forced important changes in health care worldwide. Stroke care networks have been affected, especially during peak periods. We assessed the impact of the pandemic and lockdowns in stroke admissions and care in Latin America. Materials and Methods: A multinational study (7 countries, 18 centers) of patients admitted during the pandemic outbreak (March-June 2020). Comparisons were made with the same period in 2019. Numbers of cases, stroke etiology and severity, acute care and hospitalization outcomes were assessed. Results: Most countries reported mild decreases in stroke admissions compared to the same period of 2019 (1187 vs. 1166, p = 0.03). Among stroke subtypes, there was a reduction in ischemic strokes (IS) admissions (78.3% vs. 73.9%, p = 0.01) compared with 2019, especially in IS with NIHSS 0 5 (50.1% vs. 44.9%, p = 0.03). A substantial increase in the proportion of stroke admissions beyond 48 h from symptoms onset was observed (13.8% vs. 20.5%, p < 0.001). Nevertheless, no differences in total reperfusion treatment rates were observed, with similar door-to-needle, door-toCT, and door-to-groin times in both periods. Other stroke outcomes, as all-type mortality during hospitalization (4.9% vs. 9.7%, p < 0.001), length of stay (IQR 1 5 days vs. 0 9 days, p < 0.001), and likelihood to be discharged home (91.6% vs. 83.0%, p < 0.001), were compromised during COVID-19 lockdown period. Conclusions: In this Latin America survey, there was a mild decrease in admissions of IS during the COVID-19 lockdown period, with a significant delay in time to consultations and worse hospitalization outcomes.Publication Did COVID-19 impact stroke services? A multicenter study(2022) Shokri, Hossam; El Nahas, Nevine; El Basiony, Ahmed; Nguyen, Thanh; Abdalkader, Mohamad; Klein, Piers; Lavados, Pablo; Olavarría, Verónica; Amaya, Pablo; Llanos, Natalia; Brola, Waldemar; Michał, Lipowski; Melgarejo, Donoband; Cardozo, Analia; Caballero, Cesar; Pedrozo, Fatima; Rahman, Aminur; Hokmabadi, Elyar; Jalili, Javad; Farhoudi, Mehdi; Aref, Hany; Roushdy, TamerBackground: It has been reported that acute stroke services were compromised during COVID-19 due to various pandemic-related issues. We aimed to investigate these changes by recruiting centers from different countries. Methods: Eight countries participated in this cross-sectional, observational, retrospective study by providing data from their stroke data base. We compared 1 year before to 1 year during COVID-19 as regards onset to door (OTD), door to needle (DTN), door to groin (DTG), duration of hospital stay, National Institute of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) at baseline, 24 h, and at discharge as well as modified Rankin score (mRS) on discharge and at 3 months follow-up. Results: During the pandemic year, there was a reduction in the number of patients, median age was significantly lower, admission NIHSS was higher, hemorrhagic stroke increased, and OTD and DTG showed no difference, while DTN time was longer, rtPA administration was decreased, thrombectomy was more frequent, and hospital stay was shorter. mRS was less favorable on discharge and at 3 months. Conclusion: COVID-19 showed variable effects on stroke services. Some were negatively impacted as the number of patients presenting to hospitals, DTN time, and stroke outcome, while others were marginally affected as the type of management.Item Fighting Against Stroke in Latin America: A Joint Effort of Medical Professional Societies and Governments(2021) Ouriques Martins, Sheila Cristina; Lavados, Pablo; Secchi, Thaís Leite; Brainin, Michael; Ameriso, Sebastián; Gongora-Rivera, Fernando; Sacks, Claudio; Cantú-Brito, Carlos; Álvarez Guzmán, Tony Fabián; Pérez-Romero, Germán Enrique; Muñoz Collazos, Mario; Barboza, Miguel A.; Arauz, Antonio; Abanto Argomedo, Carlos; Novarro-Escudero, Nelson; Amorin Costabile, Héctor Ignacio; Crosa, Roberto; Camejo, Claudia; Mernes, Ricardo; Maldonado, Nelson; Mora Cuervo, Daissy Liliana; Pontes Neto, Octávio Marques; Sampaio Silva, Gisele; Carbonera, Leonardo Augusto,; Souza, Ana Claudia; Gomes de Sousa, Eduardo David; Flores, Alan; Melgarejo, Donoban; Santos Carquín, Irving R.; Hoppe, Arnold; Freitas de Carvalho, João José; Mont'Alverne, Francisco; Amaya, Pablo; Bayona, Hernán; Navia, Víctor; Duran, Juan Carlos; Urrutia, Víctor C.; Vianna Araujo, Denizar; Feigin, Valery L.; Nogueira, Raúl G.Introduction: Stroke is one of the leading causes of death in Latin America, a region with countless gaps to be addressed to decrease its burden. In 2018, at the first Latin American Stroke Ministerial Meeting, stroke physician and healthcare manager representatives from 13 countries signed the Declaration of Gramado with the priorities to improve the region, with the commitment to implement all evidence-based strategies for stroke care. The second meeting in March 2020 reviewed the achievements in 2 years and discussed new objectives. This paper will review the 2-year advances and future plans of the Latin American alliance for stroke. Method: In March 2020, a survey based on the Declaration of Gramado items was sent to the neurologists participants of the Stroke Ministerial Meetings. The results were confirmed with representatives of the Ministries of Health and leaders from the countries at the second Latin American Stroke Ministerial Meeting. Results: In 2 years, public stroke awareness initiatives increased from 25 to 75% of countries. All countries have started programs to encourage physical activity, and there has been an increase in the number of countries that implement, at least partially, strategies to identify and treat hypertension, diabetes, and lifestyle risk factors. Programs to identify and treat dyslipidemia and atrial fibrillation still remained poor. The number of stroke centers increased from 322 to 448, all of them providing intravenous thrombolysis, with an increase in countries with stroke units. All countries have mechanical thrombectomy, but mostly restricted to a few private hospitals. Pre-hospital organization remains limited. The utilization of telemedicine has increased but is restricted to a few hospitals and is not widely available throughout the country. Patients have late, if any, access to rehabilitation after hospital discharge. Conclusion: The initiative to collaborate, exchange experiences, and unite societies and governments to improve stroke care in Latin America has yielded good results. Important advances have been made in the region in terms of increasing the number of acute stroke care services, implementing reperfusion treatments and creating programs for the detection and treatment of risk factors. We hope that this approach can reduce inequalities in stroke care in Latin America and serves as a model for other under-resourced environments.