Mundt, AdrianRozas, EnzoDelhey, SabineSiebenförcher, MathiasPriebe, Stefan2024-12-182024-12-182024Mundt AP, Rozas-Serri E, Fritz FD, Delhey S, Siebenförcher M, Priebe S. Need estimates of psychiatric beds: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Psychol Med. 2024 Sep 26;54(14):1-14. doi: 10.1017/S0033291724002307.https://hdl.handle.net/11447/9512This study aimed to review and synthesize the need estimates for psychiatric beds, explore how they changed over time and compare them against the prevalence of actually existing beds. We searched PubMed, Embase classic and Embase, PsycINFO and PsycIndex, Open Grey, Google Scholar, Global Health EBSCO and Proquest Dissertations, from inception to September 13, 2022. Publications providing estimates for the required number of psychiatric inpatient beds were included. Need estimates, length of stay, and year of the estimate were extracted. Need estimates were synthesized using medians and interquartile ranges (IQRs). We also computed prevalence ratios of the need estimates and the existing bed capacities at the same time and place. Sixty-five publications with 98 estimates were identified. Estimates for bed needs were trending lower until 2000, after which they stabilized. The twenty-six most recent estimates after 2000 were submitted to data synthesis (n = 15 for beds with unspecified length of stay, n = 7 for short-stay, and n = 4 for long-stay beds). Median estimates per 100 000 population were 47 (IQR: 39 to 50) beds with unspecified length of stay, 28 (IQR: 23 to 31) beds for short-stay, and 10 (IQR: 8 to 11) for long-stay beds. The median prevalence ratio of need estimates and the actual bed prevalence was 1.8 (IQR: 1.3 to 2.3) from 2000 onwards. Historically, the need estimates for psychiatric beds have decreased until about 2000. In the past two decades, they were stable over time and consistently higher than the actual bed numbers provided.enDeinstitutionalizationMeta-analysisNeed estimatesPsychiatric bedsSystematic reviewNeed estimates of psychiatric beds: a systematic review and meta-analysisArticlehttps://doi.org/10.1017/S0033291724002307