Institutional Repository UDD

Visual outcome following bilateral non-arteritic anterior ischemic optic neuropathy: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Keren, Shay
dc.contributor.author Zanolli, Mario
dc.contributor.author Dotan, Gad
dc.date.accessioned 2018-01-10T13:15:35Z
dc.date.available 2018-01-10T13:15:35Z
dc.date.issued 2017
dc.identifier.citation BMC Ophthalmology (2017) 17:155
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/11447/1875
dc.identifier.uri http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12886-017-0543-y
dc.description.abstract Background: Many patients who suffer unilateral non-arteritic anterior ischemic optic neuropathy (NAION) will eventually develop the same condition in their other eye, worrying them about losing vision in both eyes. The purpose of this meta-analysis is to determine whether it is possible to predict the visual outcome of the consecutive NAION event based on initial presentation and to compare mean visual loss of firstly versus secondly affected eyes. Methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis of studies published between January 1st 1966 and May 31st 2016 reporting on visual acuity and/or visual field loss of both affected eyes, measured either at presentation or follow-up following bilateral NAION. Results: Ten studies were included in the meta- analysis of visual acuity, including 9 retrospective reports and one randomized clinical trial, and five retrospective studies were included in visual field meta-analysis. A significant correlation exists for visual acuity (R = 0.387, P < 0.001) in both eyes of the same patient following bilateral NAION, and also for visual field loss (R = 0.445, P < 0.001) in the two eyes. The calculated coefficient of determination (R2 ) of 0.149 for visual acuity, and 0.198 for visual field loss indicates that for any given individual suffering from unilateral NAION only 15% of visual acuity and 20% of visual field loss in the secondly affected eye can be explained by these outcomes in the first eye. In addition, there was no difference in mean visual outcome of the first versus second NAION events (standardized mean differences of visual acuity 0.008, P = 0.890; and visual field loss, −0.019, P = 0.819). Conclusion: Even though a weak connection exists between visual outcome in both eyes following bilateral NAION it is still impossible to predict with certainty the visual outcome of a sequential contralateral NAION event based on the severity of visual loss in the first affected eye. Measures often taken after the first event are ineffective in improving the visual outcome of a second event should it occur.
dc.format.extent 6
dc.language.iso en_US
dc.publisher BioMed Central
dc.subject Non-Arteritic anterior ischemic optic neuropathy (NAION)
dc.subject Meta-analysis
dc.title Visual outcome following bilateral non-arteritic anterior ischemic optic neuropathy: a systematic review and meta-analysis
dc.type Artículo


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search DSpace


Browse

My Account