Negative urodynamic testing in women with stress incontinence.

Date

2015

Type:

Artículo

item.page.extent

item.page.accessRights

item.contributor.advisor

ORCID:

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

The Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists by Wiley

item.page.isbn

item.page.issn

item.page.issne

item.page.doiurl

item.page.other

item.page.references

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: A minority of women with a subjective complaint of stress urinary incontinence will have negative urodynamic stress incontinence (USI) findings. AIM: To test clinical and ultrasound measures as predictors of an unexpected absence of USI. We hypothesised that unexpectedly negative USI would be more common in young women with good pelvic floor and urethral function. METHODS: A retrospective study analysing 398 data sets from women attending a urogynaecology clinic for evaluation of lower urinary tract and pelvic floor dysfunction. Clinical, urodynamic and translabial ultrasound data were tested as possible predictors of negative USI findings. RESULTS: Women with unexpectedly negative USI findings were younger, had less anterior compartment prolapse and had a higher maximum urethral pressure. Measures of pelvic floor muscle function were not predictive. CONCLUSIONS: Women with unexpectedly negative USI are younger and have better urethral function, but voluntary pelvic floor muscle function seems unrelated to this phenomenon.

Description

item.page.coverage.spatial

item.page.sponsorship

Citation

Liversidge K, Guzmán Rojas R, Kamisan Atan I, Dietz HP. Negative urodynamic testing in women with stress incontinence. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2015 Feb;55(1):76-80.

Keywords

Pelvic floor function, Translabial ultrasound, Urodynamic stress incontinence, Urodynamics

item.page.dc.rights

item.page.dc.rights.url